期刊文献+

浅析“二次概括”是否修改超范围的中美差异 被引量:1

Differences Between China and America in Determining Whether Amendment of "Secondary Generalization" Goes Beyond Scope of Original Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "二次概括"是否修改超范围是专利授权以及确权过程中的热门问题。笔者通过"理论"联系"实践"的方式就如何准确判断二次概括是否超范围进行了论述,并对二次概括式修改是否超范围的中美评判标准进行对照分析,以期为相关专利实践提供参照。 Amendment of"secondary generalization"is a hot issue in patent authorization and patent confi rmation procedures.Through a combination of"theory"and"practice",the author makes a statement on how to judge whether an amendment of second generalization goes beyond the scope of an original application,and makes a comparative analysis between China and America on the criteria in determining whether an amendment of"secondary generalization"goes beyond the scope of an original application,in order to provide reference for the relevant patent practice.
作者 郑希元 李海霞 ZHENG Xiyuan;LI Haixia(Beijing Kangxin Intellectual Property Agency Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100098)
出处 《中国发明与专利》 2018年第11期49-52,共4页 China Invention & Patent
关键词 二次概括 修改超范围 中美差异 合理确定式“表观”二次概括 secondary generalization amendment going beyond the scope of original application differences between China and America reasonably identifi ed"apparent"second generalization
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部