期刊文献+

美国贸易政策制定中的观念、偏好与策略选择 被引量:3

Ideas, Preference and Strategic Choice in US' Trade Policymaking
原文传递
导出
摘要 在研究美国贸易政策的既有文献中,大多数学者都认为经济利益是决定美国贸易政策走向的主要因素。本文认为,观念变迁应该成为研究当前美国贸易政策调整的关键变量,因为特朗普政府的贸易政策反映出与以往政策的根本性变化。世界观、原则化信念以及因果观念这三个层次的观念通过影响美国公众的贸易偏好和决策者的策略选择在美国贸易政策制定中发挥了重要的作用。本研究对于理解中美当前贸易战的根源有着积极的意义。缓解当前中美经济对抗,仅仅有经济上针锋相对的反制措施是不够的,因为观念的变迁将会严重影响经济措施的效果。如何定位中国在现存世界体系中的地位,如何消解其他国家对于中国经济崛起的困惑与误解,将关系到中国未来与其他国家的经济关系。 Most scholars believe that economic interests are the main factor influencing a country’s trade policymaking.However,this article argues that the evolution of ideas should be a key variable in studying the current trade policy adjustments of the United States as the Donald Trump administration’s trade policy reflects a marked departure from policy stances of his predecessors.Three levels of ideas,including world view,principle-based belief and causality,play an important role in the formulation of US’trade policy by influencing the trade preferences of the US public and the strategic choices of its policymakers.This article helps understand the root causes of the current trade war between China and the United States.To alleviate the ongoing Sino-US economic confrontation,it is inadequate for China to take economic counter-measures since the evolution of ideas will undermine the effectiveness of those economic measures.How to position itself in the current world system and how to disperse other countries’confusion about and misunderstanding of its economic rise will be crucial for China’s future economic relations with the rest of the world.
作者 夏敏 Xia Min
出处 《国际经济评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期98-116,7,共20页 International Economic Review
基金 中国人民大学国际关系学院"建设世界一流学科(政治学)"科研项目支持
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1诺贝尔特.冯克.新贸易保护主义的一种形式:贸易性投资措施[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),1995(1):23-28. 被引量:4
  • 2[1]E.E.Schattschneider,Politics,Pressures and the Tariff:A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics,as Shown in the 1929 ~ 1930 Revision of the Tariff (New York:Prentice-Hall,1935).
  • 3[2]Judith Goldstein,Ideas,Interests,and American Trade Policy (Ithaca,NY:Cornell University Press,1993).
  • 4[3]Stephen P.Magee,William A.Brock,and Leslie Yound,Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Theory:Political Economy in General Equilibrium (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1989).
  • 5[1]Robert Lipsey,"U.S.Foreign Trade and the Balance of Payments:1800~1913," NBER Working Paper 4710,1994.
  • 6[2]Judith Goldstein,Ideas,Interests,andAmerican Trade Policy.pp.45~51.
  • 7[3]Robert E.Baldwin,"U.S.Trade Policies:the Role of the Executive Branch," in Alan V.Deardorff and Robert M.Stern eds.,Constituent Interests and U.S Trade Policies.(Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press,1993),pp.65~88.
  • 8[1]Michael J.Hiscox,"The Magic Bullet? The RTAA,Institutional Reform,and Trade Liberalization,"International Organization,Vol.53,No.4.(Autumn,1999),pp.669~698.
  • 9[2]Douglas A.Irwin and Randall S.Kroszner,"Interests,Institutions,and Ideology in Securing Policy Change:the Republican Conversion to Trade Liberalization after Smoot-Hawley," Journal of Law and Economics,vol.42,No.2.(Oct.1999),pp.643~673.
  • 10[1]Douglas Irwin,"The GATT's Contribution to Economic Recovery in Post-war Western Europe," NBER Working Paper No.4944,1991.

共引文献46

同被引文献55

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部