期刊文献+

PubMed与Embase的主题标引及主题检索功能比较研究 被引量:3

Comparison of subject indexing and retrieval functions between PubMed and Embase
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较分析PubMed与Embase的主题标引及检索功能。方法:从词表的发展历程、结构体系、主题标引、主题检索4个方面对Pubmed和Embase进行比较分析。结果:MeSH的历史悠久,成熟稳定,应用更广。MeSH和Emtree的结构类似,Emtree的体量更大; PubMed的主题标引在规范性方面更为出色。结论:PubMed和Embase二者各有特色,PubMed更方便易用,Embase更注重可视化操作以及检索结果处理的多样性。 Objective To compare the subject indexing and retrieval functions between PubMed and Embase.Methods The PubMed and Embase were comparatively analyzed in terms of their development history,structure system,subject indexing and retrieval.Results The MeSH had a long,mature,stable history,and a larger application scope.The structure of MeSH was similar to that of Emtree.The volume of Emtree was larger than that of MeSH while the subject indexing in PubMed was better than that in Embase.Conclusion PubMed and Embase have their own characteristics.PubMed is easier to use than Embase while Embase attaches greater importance to its visualized operation and variability in processing its retrieval results than PubMed does.
作者 王岩 张静仪 何晓阳 WANG Yan;ZHANG Jing-yi;HE Xiao-yang(Library of Ground Force Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China;Southwest University Computer and Information Science School,Chongqing 400715,China)
出处 《中华医学图书情报杂志》 CAS 2018年第6期35-41,共7页 Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science
基金 陆军军医大学人文社科基金"军事医学信息资源自动采集策略"(2015XRW18)研究成果之一
关键词 PUBMED EMBASE MESH Emtree 主题标引 主题检索 PubMed Embase MeSH Emtree Subject indexing Subject retrieval
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献50

共引文献28

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部