期刊文献+

Improved bowel preparation increases polyp detection and unmasks significant polyp miss rate 被引量:5

Improved bowel preparation increases polyp detection and unmasks significant polyp miss rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To retrospectively compare previous-day vs splitdose preparation in terms of bowel cleanliness and polyp detection in patients referred for polypectomy. METHODS: Fifty patients underwent two colonoscopies: one diagnostic in a private clinic and a second for polypectomy in a University Hospital. The latter procedures were performed within 12 wk of the index ones. Examinations were accomplished by two experienced endoscopists, different in each facility. Twenty-seven patients underwent screening/surveillance colonoscopy, while the rest were symptomatic. Previous day bowel preparation was utilized initially and splitdose for polypectomy. Colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scale. We measured the number of detected polyps, and the polyp miss rates per-polyp.RESULTS: Excellent/good preparation was reported in 38 cases with previous-day preparation(76%) vs 46 with split-dose(92%), respectively(P = 0.03). One hundred and twenty-six polyps were detected initially and 169 subsequently(P < 0.0001); 88 vs 126 polyps were diminutive(P < 0.0001), 25 vs 29 small(P = 0.048) and 13 vs 14 equal or larger than 10 mm. The miss rates for total, diminutive, small and large polyps were 25.4%, 30.1%, 13.7% and 6.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that split-dose preparation was significantly associated(OR, P) with increased number of polyps detected overall(0.869, P < 0.001), in the right(0.418, P = 0.008) and in the left colon(0.452, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Split-dose preparation improved colon cleansing, enhanced polyp detection and unmasked significant polyp miss rates. AIM: To retrospectively compare previous-day vs splitdose preparation in terms of bowel cleanliness and polyp detection in patients referred for polypectomy. METHODS: Fifty patients underwent two colonoscopies: one diagnostic in a private clinic and a second for polypectomy in a University Hospital. The latter procedures were performed within 12 wk of the index ones. Examinations were accomplished by two experienced endoscopists, different in each facility. Twenty-seven patients underwent screening/surveillance colonoscopy, while the rest were symptomatic. Previous day bowel preparation was utilized initially and splitdose for polypectomy. Colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scale. We measured the number of detected polyps, and the polyp miss rates per-polyp.RESULTS: Excellent/good preparation was reported in 38 cases with previous-day preparation(76%) vs 46 with split-dose(92%), respectively(P = 0.03). One hundred and twenty-six polyps were detected initially and 169 subsequently(P < 0.0001); 88 vs 126 polyps were diminutive(P < 0.0001), 25 vs 29 small(P = 0.048) and 13 vs 14 equal or larger than 10 mm. The miss rates for total, diminutive, small and large polyps were 25.4%, 30.1%, 13.7% and 6.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that split-dose preparation was significantly associated(OR, P) with increased number of polyps detected overall(0.869, P < 0.001), in the right(0.418, P = 0.008) and in the left colon(0.452, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Split-dose preparation improved colon cleansing, enhanced polyp detection and unmasked significant polyp miss rates.
出处 《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 SCIE 2015年第10期880-886,共7页 世界临床病例杂志
关键词 COLONOSCOPY BOWEL preparation POLYP MISS rate POLYP detection COLORECTAL cancer Colonoscopy Bowel preparation Polyp miss rate Polyp detection Colorectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1James M. Church M.D.Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy—timing is the key![J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.1998(10)
  • 2Dr. D. Frommer M.D.Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.1997(1)
  • 3Dr. R. W. Golub M.D.,B. A. Kerner M.D.,W. E. Wise M.D.,D. M. Meesig M.D.,Dr. R. F. Hartmann M.D.,K. S. Khanduja M.D.,P. S. Aguilar M.D.Colonoscopic bowel preparations—Which one?[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.1995(6)
  • 4Stephen M. Cohen M.D.,Steven D. Wexner M.D.,Sander R. Binderow M.D.,Juan J. Nogueras M.D.,Norma Daniel R.N.,Eli D. Ehrenpreis M.D.,Jonathan Jensen M.D.,Gregory F. Bonner M.D.,William B. Ruderman M.D.Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.1994(7)
  • 5Warwick J. Adams F.R.A.C.S.,Allan P. Meagher F.R.A.C.S.,David Z. Lubowski F.R.A.C.S.,Denis W. King F.R.A.C.S.Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.1994(3)
  • 6Dr. T. Muto M.D.,J. Kamiya M.D.,T. Sawada M.D.,F. Konishi M.D.,K. Sugihara M.D.,Y. Kubota M.D.,M. Adachi M.D.,S. Agawa M.D.,Y. Saito M.D.,Y. Morioka M.D.,T. Tanprayoon M.D.Small “flat adenoma” of the large bowel with special reference to its clinicopathologic features[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.1985(10)

共引文献18

同被引文献20

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部