期刊文献+

大学生网络诈骗防范中“外在性安全”反思 被引量:12

The Return of “Concept Security”: Reflection on “External Security” and Expansion of Security Paradigm in Network Fraud Prevention of College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一直以来,人们总是基于"外在性安全"的思路来认识和防范大学生网络诈骗,即网络诈骗总是由网络自身这一外部物质性存在而引起的安全问题,网络诈骗的防范就要解决网络自身的安全问题,其现实防范中由于"人的缺场"而造成"人与物互动中的狭隘性防范""技术防范的悖论""熟人陷阱的再造"等问题揭示出"外在性安全"防范的局限性。事实上,大学生个体观念的安全与否,即其观念能否揭示社会生活规则、引导其顺应生活法则也会影响到其生存安全,观念安全是大学生生存安全的前提。现实来看,网络诈骗这类网络安全就折射出大学生观念安全的隐忧,即蒙昧和未经批判的观念、以非正当信念为基础的错误观念。于此,大学生网络诈骗的防范不能忽视"观念安全"这一重要的安全范式。 For a long time,people are always used to recognizing and preventing the internet fraud of college students based on the thinking of“external security”,namely internet fraud is always caused by the external material existence of their own network safety,so network fraud prevention will solve the problem of network security to prevent its reality caused by the“absence”of people in the narrowness of interaction between people and things“prevention”,“technology to prevent paradox”,“acquaintances trap of reengineering”reveals the prevention of exteriority safety problems such as limitations.In fact,the concept of security is the premise of college students’living security,for the security of individual students,namely the idea can reveal the rules of social life,and to guide the adaptation law of life will also affect its survival security.In reality,such network security as network fraud reflects the hidden worries of college students’concept security,that is,the concept of ignorance and uncritical,and the wrong concept based on improper belief.Therefore,the prevention of online fraud of college students cannot ignore the important security paradigm of“concept security”.
作者 曾琰 Zeng Yan(School of Marxism,East China University of Political Science and Law)
出处 《当代青年研究》 CSSCI 2018年第4期29-35,共7页 Contemporary Youth Research
基金 2017年国家社科基金青年项目"社会主义核心价值观培育成效的评价体系构建研究"的阶段性成果 项目编号:17CKS034 中国博士后科学基金第62批面上项目资助的阶段性成果 项目编号:2017M621424
关键词 网络诈骗 观念安全 大学生 Network Fraud Concept Security College Students
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献32

  • 1乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].南京:译林出版社,2004.25—28.
  • 2Nicholas J Bahr. System Safety Engineering and Risk Assessment: A Practical Approach [M]. Taylor &Francis Ltd, 1997.
  • 3Vincent T Covello, W Gary Flamm, Joseph V Rodrieks, Robert G Tardiff. The Analysis of Acrual Versus Perceived Risks[M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1983:49.
  • 4G M Ballard. Nuclear Safety after Three Mile Island and Chernobyl[M]. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd Press, 1988:146.
  • 5Willie Hammer. Occupational Safety Management and Engineering[M]. Prentice-Hall Inc. , Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 07632.
  • 6B J M Ale. Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis[M]. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Press, 2001:81.
  • 7International Nuclear Safety Summary Report on the Post Advisory Group (INSAG). Accident Review Meeting on the Chernobyl Accident, Safety Series[R]. No. 75-INSAG -1, IAEA, Vienna (1986).
  • 8国际核安全咨询组.安全文化[Z].大亚湾核电运营管理有限责任公司安全文化与人因改进项目组译.北京:原子能出版社,2005:3.
  • 9Mark A Friend, James P Kohn. Fundamentals of Occupational Safety and Health[M]. Government Institute, A Division of ABS Group Inc. , 2001:190.
  • 10Jyuji Misuml, Bernhard Wilpert, Rainer Miller. Nuclear Safety: A Human Factors Perspective [M]. Taylor Francis Ltd, 1999:61.

共引文献32

引证文献12

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部