期刊文献+

央地事权划分争议解决的法律程序路径——以协商程序制度为中心 被引量:1

Legal procedure path of settlement of central-local administrative authority division disputes: Centered on the consultative procedure system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法律程序对于我国央地事权划分争议之解决具有重大价值。在可供选择的两种程序制度中,司法解纷程序受到国情现实与本身属性的诸多限制而力有不逮,而协商程序则具有制度属性、制度理念、制度效果与制度环境等方面的独特优势,理应成为央地事权划分争议解决机制的最优选择。在协商制度设计方面,可以在全国人大常委会之下设置"央地关系委员会"作为央地事权划分争议的协商平台,从提请主体、受理范围、前置审查、参与主体、共识达成等几个方面进行具体的程序设置,并借由协商过程的公开性保障协商的有效性,选择与协商民主存在结构性耦合的软法作为"协商共识"的载体。 The legal procedure is of great value to the settlement of central-local administrative authority disputes in China.The judicial mechanism is not feasible because it is limited by the reality of the national conditions and its own attributes.And the negotiation procedure with advantages in terms of system attribute,system concept,system effect and system environment should be the procedural mechanism of resolving central-local administrative authority division disputes.In the design of consultation system,we need to set up a"Central-local Relations Committee"in the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress as a consultative platform for central-local administrative authority division disputes.And specific procedures should be established from several aspects,such as the subject of request for dispute resolution,scope of acceptance,pre examination,determining the participants and consensus reached.And we can ensure the effectiveness of negotiation through the openness of the negotiation process.In addition,we should choose the soft law which has structural coupling with negotiation procedure as the carrier of"consensus of negotiation".
作者 沈斌 SHEN Bin(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期93-102,共10页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基金 2017年度国家社会科学基金项目"央地财政权责配置中政府与市场互动机制研究"(17BFX103) 中南财经政法大学研究生科研创新项目"纳税人权利保护视角下的地方税收立法权研究"(20180608)
关键词 央地事权划分争议 法律程序 协商程序 软法 disputes of central-local administrative authority division legal proceedings negotiation procedure soft law
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献248

共引文献1098

同被引文献34

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部