期刊文献+

重构家计:转型社会的家庭研究理路 被引量:3

Reconstructing Householding:The Approaches of Family Studies in the Transitional Society
原文传递
导出
摘要 "转型社会"对于家庭研究的意义何在,是长期被学界所忽视的问题。一直以来,中国家庭研究对于转型社会有着两种彼此疏离的认识,一是聚焦国家与市场对家庭的冲击与依托,二是关注个体于家庭的脱离与回归。追溯并考察卡尔·波兰尼的经典转型社会理论,《巨变》中存在着一条关注家计的叙事线索,表现为个体命运因为家庭的瓦解,而同国家与市场的隐显关联为整体的研究命题。新自由主义在20世纪70年代兴起,促使家庭的外部世界与内在秩序发生转型,家庭展开了再制度化。学界重拾对家计的关注,研究命题逐渐分离为"国家—市场与家庭"以及"个体与家庭"。家计的重构催生了家庭研究对于转型社会认识的分野。 The meaning of“transitional society”for family studies is long neglected by the academic circle.For a long time,family studies in China have two separate understandings for transitional society.One of them focuses on the influence and support of state and market for families.The other emphasizes on the breakaway of individuals from families and the return of them to families.Retrospecting and reviewing Karl Polanyi s classic theory on transitional society,this paper finds out a narrative clue about householding in The Great Transformation:Because of the disintegration of householding,individual fate is associated with the state and market,and this association forms an integral research proposition.The rise of new liberalism in the 1970s led to the transformation of the outer world and inner order of families,and thus families were institutionalized again.Researchers focused again on householding,and their propositions were gradually separated into two areas:“state-market and family”and“individual and family”.It is the reconstruction of householding that causes the dividing of the understandings of family studies about transitional society.
作者 刘新宇 Liu Xinyu
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期24-32,共9页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
关键词 转型社会 家庭研究 波兰尼 家计 transitional society family studies Karl Polanyi householding
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献343

共引文献436

同被引文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部