摘要
与域外的情况不同,在中国的医疗纠纷中,医疗责任保险的保险人至今仍置身事外。反观我国《保险法》第66条,虽然法律条文极为简要,但并未明确禁止保险人的抗辩义务。本文以《保险法》第66条为核心,利用目的性扩张的法律解释方法,将保险人的抗辩义务定性为法定义务、主给付义务,以此展开如何履行抗辩义务以及不履行抗辩义务的法律后果两部分,并就部分问题略陈管见。
Different from foreign cases,the insurers of medical liability insurance remains aloof from China s medical tangles.Articte 66 of Insurance Law,even though with very brief legal provisions,do not expressly prohibit insurers duty to defend.In view of this,this paper focuses on Articte 66 of Insurance Law and uses the legal interpretation method of intentional expansion,and defines the insurer s duty to defend as an statutory obligation and a main payment obligation.Based on this,this paper discusses about the methods of fulfilling the duty to defend and the legal consequence of not fulfilling the duty,as well as a few of other issues.
作者
程科
刘兰秋
Cheng Ke;Liu Lanqiu
出处
《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期104-114,共11页
Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目"中国医疗纠纷数据库建设与基于数据库应用的医疗纠纷防控机制研究"(15BGL194)的阶段性成果
关键词
医疗责任保险
抗辩义务
目的性扩张
损害赔偿
medical liability insurance
duty to defend
intentional expansion
compensation for damages