期刊文献+

渗透与溢出:领导正直的涓滴效应研究 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,领导正直逐渐受到管理学界的高度重视。基于社会学习理论,本文构建了多层次的管理者领导正直的涓滴效应模型,并对通过"高层管理者-中层管理者-基层员工"配对样本收集的数据进行验证。结果表明:高层管理者的领导正直能够显著地正向影响中层管理者的领导正直,产生涓滴效应;高层管理者的领导正直能够显著地负向影响基层员工的组织政治知觉,中层管理者的领导正直在其中起完全中介作用,并产生溢出效应。基于此,本文提出管理者要转变领导风格、组织要加强关于领导正直的培训、建立公平公正的企业文化、引入领导正直的招聘甄别体系等对策,以减少组织政治行为。 In recent years,leader integrity has been paid special attention to in management academia.Based on the theory of social learning,this paper constructs Trickle-down Effect Model of leader integrity of leaders at different levels from the perspective of social learning,and verifies the data collected through the pairing samples of top managers,middle managers and bottom employees.The result shows:top managers'leader integrity has a significant positive effect on that of middle managers,which has a Trickle-down Effect;top managers have a remarkable negative effect on perceptions of organizational politics of grass-roots employees,and middle managers'leader integrity has a completely mediating effect in it,which engenders Spillover Effect.Based on this,this paper proposes countermeasures that managers should change their leadership styles,and organizations should strengthen training on leadership integrity,establish a fair and equitable corporate culture,and introduce the recruitment and recognition system with leading integrity in order to reduce the level of perceptions of organizational politics of grassroots employees.
出处 《企业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第11期136-141,共6页 Enterprise Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"领导正直的前因与结果:一项追踪研究"(项目编号:71462010) 江西省教育科学"十三五"规划课题"大学毕业生政治技能研究--以江西省为例"(项目编号:18YB319)
关键词 领导正直 组织政治知觉 涓滴效应 溢出效应 leader integrity perceptions of organizational politics Trickle-down Effect Spillover Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献307

  • 1Berry L L, Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V A. Lmproving service quality in America: lessons learned [ J ]. Academy of Management Executive, 1994, 8 (2) : 32 - 52.
  • 2Spears L C. Insights on Leadership: Service, Stewardship, Spirit, and Servant-leadership [ M]. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1998. 1 - 12.
  • 3Smith B N, Montagno R V, Kuzmenko T N. Transformational and servant leadership: Content and contextual comparisons [ J]. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2004, 10 (4) : 80 -91.
  • 4Waldman D A, Yammarino F J. CEO charismatic leadership: Level-of-management and level-of-analysis effects [ J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24 (2) : 266 - 285.
  • 5Mayer D M, Kuenzi M, Greenbaum R, etc. How low dose ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model [ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 2009, 108 (1): 1-13.
  • 6Hackman J R. Group influence on individuals in organizations [A]. In: Dunnette M D, Hough L M: Handbook oflndustrial and Organizational Psychology ( V. 3 ) [ C ]. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992. 199 -267.
  • 7Chen G, Kirkman B L, Kanfer R, etc. A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams ~ J]. Journal of Applied PsyChology, 2007, 92 ( 2 ) : 331 - 346.
  • 8Liao H, Chuang A. Transforming service Employees and climate : A multilevel, multisouree examination of transformational leadership in building Long-term service relationships [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92 (4) : 1006 - 1019.
  • 9Chen G, Bliese P D. The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87 (3) : 549 - 556.
  • 10Meyer J P, Stanley D J, Herscovitch L, etc. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequence [ J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2002, 61 ( 1 ) : 20 - 52.

共引文献106

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部