期刊文献+

共享经济研究的三个方法论基础分析 被引量:4

A Brief Analysis of the Three Methodological Foundations of the Research on Shared Economy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前我国共享经济研究滞后于共享经济实践。究其原因,方法论层面的缺陷首当其冲。在关于共享经济是什么的研究中,一些研究者仅仅停留在用已有的学说、概念、理论来考察和理解新生的共享经济,而忽视了"以共享经济为方法"的方法论基础;关于共享经济应该如何发展的研究中,一些研究者聚焦于对具有"共时性"的国内外共享经济实践进行简单的对比分析,而疏忽了"历史时间的立场和整体的立场"的方法论基础;在关于政府应该如何实施共享经济运行管理及规制的研究中,一些研究者没有深入到共享经济的社会实践之中,而是利用一些过去普遍适用的经验来简单"裁套"共享经济,未能坚持"从内向外看和由下往上看"的方法论基础。 At present,China's research on shared economy lags behind the practice of shared economy.The reason for this is that defects in methodology.In the study of what the shared economy is,some researchers only stay with the existing theories,concepts and theories to examine and understand the new shared economy,but ignore the methodology basis of"view sharing economy as a method".On the research on how to develop the shared economy,some researchers only compare and analyze the shared economy at home and abroad,and neglect the methodological basis of"the standpoint of historical time and the standpoint of the whole".In the study of how the government should implement the management and regulation of shared economic operation,some researchers have not deeply study the social practice of the shared economy,but use some commonly applied experiences to guide the shared economy and fail to adhere to the methodological basis of"position of up to down and inside to outside".
作者 包双叶 BAO Shuang-ye
出处 《产业经济评论》 2018年第6期76-85,共10页 Review of Industrial Economics
基金 上海市教委2014年度"阳光计划"项目"马克思恩格斯的城市化与生态思想及其当代价值研究"(14YGO4)
关键词 共享经济 方法论 理论分析 Shared economy View sharing economy as a method Standpoint of historical time and the standpoint of the whole Position of up to down and inside to outside
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献135

  • 1Agency, S. F. (2014), "Taxis and accessible services division: Status of taxi industry", http://www, sfmta, com.
  • 2Airbnb (2014), "Airbnb economic impact", http://blog. airbnb, com.
  • 3Bardhi, E & G. M. Eckhardt(2012) ,"Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing", Journal of Consumer Research 39 (4) :881--898.
  • 4Belk, R. (2007),"Why not share rather than own", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sci ence 611(1) :126--140.
  • 5Belk, R. (2010) ,"Sharing", Journal of Consumer Research 37(5) :715--734.
  • 6Belk, R. (2014),"You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online", Journal of Business Research 67(8) : 1595-- 1600.
  • 7Benkler, Y. (2004), "Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production", Yale Law Journal 114(2):273-- 358.
  • 8Beyer, S. (2015),"How to solve the Uber vs taxi conflict?" http://www, forbes, com.
  • 9Botsman, R. & R. Rogers(2010), What's Mine is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live, New York: Harper Collins.
  • 10Cervero, R. , G. Aaron & N. Brendan(2007) ,"City eareshare: Longer term travel dermnd and car ownership impacts", Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1992(1) ..70--80.

共引文献571

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部