期刊文献+

基于BN网络的学生广义认知诊断模型研究 被引量:1

Research on BN-based generalized cognitive diagnosis model for students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统教学中对学生心理变化和广义认知的测量与诊断只给出分数值,而无法对分数值相同的不同知识结构进行解释的缺点,文中基于目前学生认知诊断的任务更多的是学生测试结果的反馈信息,将贝叶斯网络(BN)引入学生广义认知诊断中。主要进行了两个研究,分别为测验所得数据进行贝叶斯结构的学习得到属性间的层级关系与构建BN网络分类器对学生认知状态进行分类。最后,对所构造的基于BN网络的学生广义认知诊断模型进行验证。结果表明,其得到的属性层级关系合理,分类性能良好,具有广阔的应用前景。 In allusion to the disadvantage that only score values are given for measurement and diagnosis of students′psy-chological change and generalized cognition,and different knowledge structures with the same score value cannot be explained in the traditional teaching,the Bayesian network(BN)is introduced into the generalized cognitive diagnosis of students on the basis of the fact that,as for the current task of student cognitive diagnosis,information feedback of student test results is more important.The Bayesian structure learning is conducted for the data obtained from the test,so as to obtain hierarchical relation-ships between attributes.The BN network classifier is constructed to classify the students′cognitive states.A verification was conducted for the constructed BN-based generalized cognitive diagnosis model of students.The results show that the obtained hierarchical relationships between attributes are reasonable,the classification performance is good,and the model has a broad application prospect.
作者 郗闽 XI Min(Xi’an Aeronautical University,Xi’an 710077,China)
机构地区 西安航空学院
出处 《现代电子技术》 北大核心 2018年第24期79-81,85,共4页 Modern Electronics Technique
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费(RW150143) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC630090) 陕西省社会科学基金项目(13E009)~~
关键词 学生教学 认知诊断 贝叶斯网络 结构学习 层级关系 分类性能 student teaching cognitive diagnosis Bayesian network structure learning hierarchical relationship classifi-cation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1余娜,辛涛.规则空间模型的简介与述评[J].中国考试,2007(9):14-19. 被引量:10
  • 2Embretson S E. A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change[J].PSYCHOMETRIKA,1991,(03):495-515.
  • 3Gierl M J,Zheng Y,Cui Y. Using the attribute hierarchy method to identify and interpret cognitive skills that produce group differences[J].J Educational Measurement,2008,(01):65-89.
  • 4Henson R,Roussos L,Douglas J. Cognitive diagnostic attribute-level discrimination indices[J].Applied Psychological Measturement,2008,(04):275-288.
  • 5Tatsuoka K K. Cognitive Assessment:an Introduction to the Rule Space Method[M].New York:Taylor & Francis Group,2009.
  • 6Bolt D. The present and future of IRT-based cognitive diagnostic models (ICDMs) and related methods[J].J Educational Measurement,2007,(04):377-383.
  • 7Junker B W,Sijtsma K. Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions,and connections with nonparametric item response theory[J].Applied Psychological Measturement,2001,(03):258-272.
  • 8Templin J L,Henson R A,Templin S E. Robustness of hierarchical modeling of skill association in cognitive diagnosis models[J].Applied Psychological Measturement,2008,(07):559-574.
  • 9Patz R J,Junker B W. A straightforward approach to Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for item response models[J].J Educational and Behavioral Statistics,1999,(02):146-178.
  • 10de la Torre J,Douglas J. Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis[J].PSYCHOMETRIKA,2004,(03):333-353.

共引文献117

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部