期刊文献+

潍坊市公立医院内部控制评价指标体系构建研究 被引量:6

Study on Construction of Evaluation Index System for Internal Control of Public Hospitals in Weifang City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨公立医院内部控制评价指标体系的设计和构建。方法:通过文献研究法、小组讨论法进行指标的初筛,采用Delphi法筛选确定指标并建立评价指标体系框架。利用层次分析法计算各级指标重要性的权重值,形成内部控制评价指标体系。结果:选出5个一级指标和28个二级指标,再进行两轮Delphi法确定了包括5个一级指标、26个二级指标在内的内部控制评价指标体系框架。经过层次分析法得到一级指标的权重,分别为控制环境0.406、风险管理0.214、控制活动0.188、信息与沟通0.094、监督评价0.101。结论:Delphi法和层次分析法确定的公立医院内部控制评价指标体系具有可靠性,为公立医院内部控制的评价提供了客观的定量依据。 Objective:To discuss the construction and design of internal control application system in public hospitals.Methods:The indicators could be filtrated at first through the methods of research of literature and group-discussions.Delphi method could determine the indicators and establish the framework of evaluation-index system.Weights of importance of all levels of indicators were calculated by using AHP.And the internal control application system could be formed in the end.Results:5 primary indicators and 28 secondary indicators were selected.Then two rounds of Delphi method were used to determine the framework of internal control evaluation index system including 5 primary indicators,26 secondary indicators.Through the statistical analysis,we got the weight of primary indicators which respectively were control environment 0.406,risk management 0.214,control activities 0.188,information and communication 0.094,monitoring and evaluation 0.101.Conclusion:The evaluation index system of internal control of public hospitals determined by Delphi and AHP is reliable,which provides an objective quantitative basis for the evaluation of internal control in public hospitals.
作者 徐静 于允圣 杨晓会 王玲 尤静 孙广宁 杜凤香 Xu Jing(Weifang Maternity and Child Care Hospital,Weifang,261011)
出处 《医学与社会》 北大核心 2018年第12期47-49,共3页 Medicine and Society
基金 潍坊市卫生计生委科研项目"公立医院内部控制体系建设研究" 编号为2016wsjs043
关键词 公立医院 内部控制 评价指标体系 Public Hospital Internal Control Evaluation Index System
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献42

  • 1纪爱兵,庞佳宏,李树环.社区老年人生活质量的模糊综合评定模型及其应用[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(3):542-545. 被引量:6
  • 2刘颖芬,占济舟.比例标度一致性比较的新方法[J].统计与决策,2007,23(15):17-18. 被引量:9
  • 3Leander M, Lampa E, Janson C, et al. Determinants for a low health-related quality of Life in asthmatics [J]. Ups J Med Sci, 2012, 117 (1): 57-66.
  • 4Maino M, Pefez P, Oviedo P, et al. The analytic hierarchy pro- cess in decisionmaking for caprine health proganunes [J]. Rev Sci Tech, 2012, 31 (3): 889-897.
  • 5孙振球.医学统计学[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,2006510-514.
  • 6肯尼斯.阿罗.社会选择:个性与多准则.北京:首都贸易大学出版社,2000.
  • 7Page K. The four principles: can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making? [ J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 2012, 13 (2) : 1 -8.
  • 8Molenaar WM, Zanting A, van Beukelen P, et al. A framework of teaching competencies across the medical education continuum [J]. Medical Teacher, 2009, 31 (5): 390-396.
  • 9Sherbino J, Frank JR, Snell L. Defining the key roles and competencies of the clinician educator of the 21st century: A national mixedmethods study [J]. Acad Med, 2014, 89 (5): 783 - 789.
  • 10Zink T, Solberg E. Development of a global health curriculum for family medicine based on ACGME eompctcncies [ J ]. Teaching & Learning in Medicine, 2014, 26 (2) : 174 - 183.

共引文献100

同被引文献55

引证文献6

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部