期刊文献+

穿支皮瓣术、胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术对手外伤软组织缺损的治疗 被引量:8

Comparison of the Effect of Percutaneous Flap and Chest and Abdomen Pedicle Flap Repair on Soft Tissue Defect of Hand Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究在手外伤软组织缺损治疗时,应用穿支皮瓣术与胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术治疗的效果。方法:以2015年3月-2018年2月68例手外伤软组织缺损患者作为研究对象,按照随机方法将患者分为对照组(胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术)和观察组(穿支皮瓣术)。结果:治疗后观察组IL-6、IL-8、LPS、TNF等指标改善显著且优于对照组,且观察组治疗成功率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:相比较胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术而言,穿支皮瓣术治疗手外伤软组织缺损的效果更好,值得推广应用。 Objective:To investigate the effect of perforating branch flap and pedicled pectoral-abdominal flap in the treatment of soft tissue defect of hand trauma.Methods:From March 2015 to February 2018,68 patients with soft tissue defect of hand trauma were randomly divided into two groups:the control group(pedicled pectoral-abdominal flap)and the observation group(perforating branch flap).Results:After treatment,the indexes of IL-6,IL-8 and LPS-TNF in the observation group were significantly improved and better than those in the control group,and the success rate of treatment in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:compared with the pedicle flap repair of chest and abdomen,perforating branch flap is more effective in the treatment of soft tissue defect of hand trauma,which is worth popularizing.
作者 李振科 冯华杰 李世浩 温志远 Li Zhenke(Guangdong Kaiping City Central Hospital(Kaiping Guangdong Province 529300))
出处 《黑龙江医药》 CAS 2018年第6期1315-1317,共3页 Heilongjiang Medicine journal
关键词 穿支皮瓣术 胸腹部带蒂皮瓣修复术 手外伤软组织缺损 治疗效果 perforating branch flap pedicled pectoral-abdominal flap repair soft tissue defect of hand trauma therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献62

  • 1梁智,任林森,俞宝,黄广孚,周晓天.带真皮下血管网超薄皮瓣血运重建的实验研究(三)超薄皮瓣的再血管化与血供变化[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,1994,8(4):242-244. 被引量:14
  • 2龚志鑫,邵新中,张克亮,韩金豹,于亚东,田德虎,张冰.腹部真皮下血管网皮瓣修复多指皮肤缺损[J].中华手外科杂志,2005,21(3):167-168. 被引量:30
  • 3马显杰,鲁开化,艾玉峰,柳大烈.下腹部双叶真皮下血管网皮瓣在手部撕脱伤中的应用[J].中华手外科杂志,1995,11(2):116-118. 被引量:20
  • 4武志洪,熊龙,凌峰.单轴分叶真皮下血管网超薄皮瓣修复多手指伤[J].实用临床医学(江西),2006,7(7):75-76. 被引量:1
  • 5Meschia JF, Brott TG, Hobson RW. Diagnosis and invasive management of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis [ J ]. Mayo Clin Proc,2007,82(7) :851 - 858.
  • 6Jander S, Sitzer M, Wendt A, et al. Expression of tissue factor in high-grade carotid artery stenosis. Association with plaque destabilization [ J ]. Stroke, 2001,32 ( 4 ) : 850 - 854.
  • 7Hegland O, Dickstein K, Larsen JP. Effect of simvastatin inpreventing progression of carotid artery stenosis [ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2001,87 (5) : 643 - 645.
  • 8A1-Mubarak N, Colombo A, Gaines PA, et al. Multicenter e- valuation of carotid artery stenting with a filtter protection system [ J 1- J Am Coil Cardiol,2002,39 ( 5 ) : 841 - 846.
  • 9Poppert H, Wolf O, Resch M, et al. Differences in number, size and location of intracranial microembolic lesions after surgical versus endovascular treatment without protection device of carotid artery stenosis [ J ]. J Neurol, 2004,251 (10) : 1198 - 1203.
  • 10Kastfup A, GroscheI K, Krapf H, et al. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices; a systematic review of the literature [ J ]. Stroke,2003,34(5) :1813 - 1819.

共引文献60

同被引文献74

引证文献8

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部