期刊文献+

美国中小学教师培养的专业认证 被引量:5

The Professional Accreditation of the Teacher Education for Teachers in Primary and Secondary Schools in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国中小学教师培养的专业认证经历了认证的一体化转向,形成了以州政府教育部门、教师教育专业认证组织、各类专业协会联合共治的具有层次性、兼容性和开放性的认证体系。认证体系把提高教师教育机构的专业性、促进教师的专业发展作为其目标导向。美国中小学教师培养的专业认证主要有CAEP认证和NASM认证两种类型,它们都执行严格的认证标准和认证程序,对我国健全教师教育质量认证和保障体系具有现实的借鉴意义。 The professional accreditation of the teacher training for the teachers of primary and secondary schools in the United States has been transferred to a union system,which has integrated the educational department of state government,teacher education certification organizations and various professional associations into a systematic certification.The ultimate goals of professional accreditation of the teacher training for the teachers of primary and secondary schools in the United States are to improve the professionalism of teacher education institutions and promote the professional development of teachers.There are two types of professional accreditation:institutional certification and professional certification.Taking CAEP and NASM as the examples,this paper illustrates the two types of accreditation standards and procedures.The practical professional standards for teacher preparation institutions and professional accreditation in the United States give some enlightenment to constructing a native accreditation system of teacher training.
作者 范颐 王远 FAN Yi;WANG Yuan(Faculty of Education,Southwest University,Chongqin 400715,China)
出处 《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期99-105,共7页 Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University
基金 西南大学校级教改项目"高师音乐教育培养目标改革研究"[20700109]
关键词 美国教育 中小学教师 教师培养 专业认证 American education teachers of primary and secondary schools teacher training professional accreditation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献24

  • 1谢安邦,荀渊.对我国建立教师教育认可制度的思考[J].教师教育研究,2005,17(5):1-5. 被引量:7
  • 2TEAC, about TEAC, http ://www. teat. org/about/index. asp.
  • 3TEAC, TEAC accreditation process, http://www. teac. org/ accreditation/goals/stdqualityphil. asp # philosophy.
  • 4Frank B. Murray, On Some Differences between TEAC and NCATE, http://www. teae. org/literature/ onsomedifferencesjan04. pdf.
  • 5http://www. houstoncul. org/edu2006/2006082. htm.
  • 6Greenberg J. & Walsh K.. 2014 Teacher Preparation Re- view [ EB/OL]. http: //www. nctq. org/dmsView/Teach- er_Prep_Review_2014_Report, 2015 - 05 - 17.
  • 7周均.美国教师教育认可标准的变革与发展[M].北京:北京师范大学出社,2009:233-235.
  • 8CAEP. Report and Reconmendation of the NCATE/TEAC Design Team to Our Respective Boards of DirectorsEB/ OL]. http: //www. caepsite, org/documents/designteam- report, pdf, 2015 -05 - 15.
  • 9Vergari S. & Hess F. M.. The Accreditation Game: Can accreditation ensure quality teacher training? [ J]. Educa- tion Next, 2002 (2) : 15 -23.
  • 10Murray F. B.. Lessons from Ten Years of TEAC' s Ac- crediting Activity [ J ]. Issues in Teacher Education, 2010 (1): 7-19.

同被引文献113

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部