期刊文献+

慢性踝关节不稳的临床检查方法与评分量表系统 被引量:22

The clinical measures and scoring systems for chronic ankle instability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 慢性踝关节不稳定是踝扭伤后最常见的遗留问题。本文回顾、检索了慢性踝关节不稳定临床评价方法的相关文献,并进行了综述。对检索文献进行质量评价显示,目前针对慢性踝关节不稳的文献大多为3组和4组证据等级,缺少高等级的研究;进一步的研究方向应当采用更高证据等级的实验设计进行。针对慢性踝关节不稳定的临床评价包括主观评价和客观评价,综合本研究纳入的文献,主观评价的量表中,推荐采用Karlsson评分系统进行评分与随访,同时建议采用AOFAS评分、VAS评分、FAOS及FAAM评分系统;客观评价建议采用前抽屉试验和距骨倾斜试验,此外应考虑采纳重返运动做为评价项目之一。 Chronic ankle instability is the most common residual problem after ankle sprain.This article reviews and retrieves the literature on clinical evaluation of chronic ankle instability.The quality evaluation of the literature retrieval shows that most of the current literature for chronic ankle instability is3and4groups of evidence level,the lack of high-grade research;further research direction should use a higher level of evidence experimental design.The clinical evaluation of chronic ankle instability includes subjective evaluation and objective evaluation.The Karlsson scoring system is recommended for scoring and follow-up according to the literature included in this study and the scale of subjective evaluation.At the same time,AOFAS score,VAS score,FAOS and FAAM scoring system were recommended,anterior drawer test and talus tilt test were recommended for objective evaluation,and re-entry exercise should be considered as one of the evaluation items.
作者 王智 孙超 张树 张建中 WANG Zhi;SUN Chao;ZHANG Shu;ZHANG Jianzhong(Department of Ankle Surgery,Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Tongren Hospital,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《足踝外科电子杂志》 2018年第2期1-7,共7页 Electronic Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
基金 骨科微创手术术中实时可视化虚拟仿真系统的研发及应用(2017YFC0108103)
关键词 慢性踝关节不稳定 临床评价 AOFAS后量表 Karlsson评分 FAOS量表 FAAM量表 前抽屉试验 距骨倾斜试验 应力试验 Chronic ankle instability Clinical assessment AOFAS hindfoot score Karlsson scoring system FAOS FAAM Anterior drawer test Talus inclining test Stress test
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1Renstrom PA, Konradsen L. Ankle ligament injuries. Br JSportsMed, 1997, 31 (1) : 11-20.
  • 2Robbins S, Waked E. Factors associated with ankle inju- ries : preventive measures. Sports Med, 1998, 25 ( 1 ): 63-72.
  • 3Yeung MS, Chan KM, Yuan WY. An epidemiological survey on ankle sprain. Br J Sports Med, 1994, 28 (2): 112-116.
  • 4McKay GD, Goldie PA, Payne WR, et al. Ankle inju- ries in basketball : injury rate and risk factors. Br J Sports Med, 2001, 35 (2): 103-108.
  • 5Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, et al. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains .. a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int, 1998, 19 (10) : 653-660.
  • 6Hubbard T J, Kaminski TW. Kinesthesia is not affected by fimctional ankle instability status. J Athl Train, 2002, 37 (4) : 481-486.
  • 7Rozzi SL, Lephart SM, Stemer R, et al. Balance training for persons with functionally unstable ankles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1999, 29 (8) : 478-486.
  • 8Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, et al. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool : Report of validity and reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 87 (9) 1235-1241.
  • 9De Noronha M, Refshauge KM, Kilbreath SL, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian-Portuguese ver- sion of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) . DisabilRehabil, 2008, 30 (26): 1959-1965.
  • 10Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self- report measures. Spine, 2000, 25 (24):3186-3191.

共引文献57

同被引文献178

引证文献22

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部