CT与磁共振成像在早期强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变中的诊断价值对比被引量：6

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的对比分析在早期强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变中应用电子计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)的诊断价值。方法选取我院2017年4月—2018年4月收治的早期强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变患者70例,分别应用CT和MR I检查,对比其诊断价值。结果 MR I的0级病变、Ⅰ级病变检出率高于CT(P<0.05),Ⅱ级病变检出率与CT差异不显著(P>0.05);MRI的骨质侵蚀、骨质硬化检出率低于CT(P<0.05),关节面下骨质囊变、L5～S1关节突病变和骨髓水肿检出率高于CT(P<0.05),对关节腔隙改变的检出率与CT比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论在早期强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变的诊断中可优先选择MRI,若病变不明确可结合CT扫描确诊。

作者王艳田荣华

机构地区孝感市中心医院

出处《基层医学论坛》 2019年第1期83-84,共2页 The Medical Forum

关键词早期强直性脊柱炎诊断电子计算机断层扫描磁共振成像

分类号 R593.23 [医药卫生—内科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1蔡长寿,冯丰坔,邱波,裴琳,于大飞.CT和MRI在早期强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变中的诊断价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2016,26(6):1132-1135. 被引量：82
2施桂英.强直性脊柱炎诊治指南(草案)[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2003,7(10):641-644. 被引量：236
3王保奇.对比X线、CT和MRI在诊断早期强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变诊断中的价值[J].中国数字医学,2017,12(3):30-31. 被引量：49
4高岱,李坤鹏,文琼芳,朱剑,张江林,黄烽.骶髂关节CT不同分级标准在强直性脊柱炎诊断和随访中应用价值的比较[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(39):3137-3141. 被引量：21
5周春山,黄燕.强直性脊柱炎早期骶髂关节炎的磁共振诊断价值[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2016,36(A02):1003-1003. 被引量：5

二级参考文献34

1Rudwaleit M, Khan MA, Sieper J. The challenge of diagnosis andclassification in early ankylosing spondylitis : do we need newcriteria? [J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2005, 52(4) : 1000-1008. DOI:10. 1002/art. 20990.
2Dougados M. Diagnostic features of ankylosing spondylitis[J]. BrJ Rheumatol, 1995, 34 ( 4 ): 301-303. DOI: 10. 1093/rheumatology/34.4. 301.
3Feldtkeller E,Khan MA,van der Heijde D, et al. A geat diseaseonset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positivepatients with ankylosing spondylitis[J]. Rheumatol Int, 2003,23(2):61-66. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-002-02374.
4Dihlmann W, Giirtler KF, Heller M. Computer tomography of thesacroiliac joints[J]. Rofo, 1979, 130 (6) :659-665. DOI: 10.1055/8-0029-1231350.
5Devauchelle-Pensec V,D' Agostino MA, Marion J, et al.Computed tomography scanning facilitates the diagnosis ofsacroiliitis in patients with suspected spondylarthritis : results of aprospective multicenter French cohort study[J]. Arthritis Rheum,2012,64(5) :1412-1419. DOI: 10.1002/art. 33466.
6Geijer M,Sihlbom H,Gothlin JH, et al. The role of CT in thediagnosis of sacro-iliitis [ J ]. Acta Radiol, 1998,39 ( 3 ) : 265 -268. D01:10.1080/02841859809172191.
7Geijer M, Gothlin GG,Gothlin JH. The clinical utility ofcomputed tomography compared to conventional radiography indiagnosing sacroiliitis. A retrospective study on 910 patients andliterature review[J]. J Rheumatol, 2007,34(7) :1561-1565.
8Lee YH, Hwang JY, Lee SW. The clinical usefulness ofmultidetector computed tomography of the sacroiliac joint forevaluating spondyloarthropathies [ J ]. Korean J Intern Med,2007,22(3) :171-177. DOI: 10. 3904/kjim. 2007. 22.3.171.
9Mandl P, Navarro-Compan V, Terslev L,et al. EULARrecommendations for the use of imaging in the diagnosis andmanagement of spondyloarthritis in clinical practice [ J ]. AnnRheum Dis, 2015,74(7):1327-1339.
10Geijer M, Gothlin GG, Gothlin JH. Observer variation incomputed tomography of the sacroiliac joints: a retrospectiveanalysis of 1383 cases [ J ]. Acta Radiol, 2007,48 : 665-671.