期刊文献+

全球价值链下金砖国家制造业出口结构分解及竞争力测算 被引量:3

Export Structure Decomposition and Competitiveness Measurement of BRICS Exports in Global Value Chain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用WWZ分解方法,结合WIOD数据库,从制造业的整体行业和细分行业两个方面出发对金砖国家2005—2014年出口进行价值分解,基于前向联系测算竞争力RCA_VD指数。分析表明:巴西的制造业水平处于较上游位置;中国制造业向GVC高端靠近,仍处于较低端位置;印度的制造业水平不断下滑,对于制造业进口品依赖较大;俄罗斯制造业处于高端位置。中国的低技术行业相对处于下游,高技术行业正在向上游靠近;印度的中低技术行业和中高技术行业明显处于下游;俄罗斯在所有行业均处于上游。巴西的低技术行业具有比较优势,高技术行业劣势明显;中国所有行业都具有比较优势;印度的低技术、中低技术行业具有比较优势,高技术行业则处于明显劣势;俄罗斯的中低技术行业具有比较优势,其余明显处于竞争劣势,行业发展不均衡。一国制造业规模大小、比较优势与全球价值链参与程度和地位不存在明显线性关系。 This paper uses WWZ decomposition method and WIOD database to analyze the value of BRICS exports from2005to2014from the perspective of the whole manufacturing industry and segmented industries,and calculates the competitiveness RCA_VD index based on forward linkage.The research shows:1)the manufacturing level of Brazil is in a relatively upstream position.China s manufacturing sector is moving towards the upstream of GVC and remains at the low end.India s manufacturing sector is declining and is heavily dependent on manufacturing imports.Russia s manufacturing sector is at the top;2)China s low-tech industries are relatively downstream,while India s low-tech and medium-tech industries are obviously downstream.China s high-tech industries are moving closer to the upstream,while Russia s is in the upstream of all industries;3)Brazil s low-technology industries have comparative advantages,while high-technology industries have obvious disadvantages.All industries in China have comparative advantages.India s low-tech,medium-tech and low-tech industries have comparative advantages,while its high-tech industries have obvious disadvantages.Russia s low-and medium-technology industries have comparative advantages,while the rest have obvious competitive disadvantages and uneven development.There is no significant linear relationship between a country s manufacturing scale,comparative advantage and GVCS participation and status.
作者 常冉 杨来科 CHANG Ran;YANG Laike(East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
机构地区 华东师范大学
出处 《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第6期89-96,共8页 Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目"全球价值链嵌入 贸易隐含碳与中国的减排潜力及政策模拟"(16AGJ002)
关键词 全球价值链 上游 下游 WWZ RCA_VD global value chain upstream downstream WWZ RCA_VD
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献98

  • 1郑昭阳,孟猛.基于投入产出法对中国出口中价值含量的分析[J].南开经济研究,2011(2):3-15. 被引量:11
  • 2金碚,李钢,陈志.中国制造业国际竞争力现状分析及提升对策[J].财贸经济,2007,28(3):3-10. 被引量:76
  • 3黄先海,韦畅.中国制造业出口垂直专业化程度的测度与分析[J].管理世界,2007,23(4):158-159. 被引量:46
  • 4刘遵义,陈锡康,杨翠红,Leonard K.Cheng,K.C.Fung,Yun-Wing Sung,祝坤福,裴建锁,唐志鹏.非竞争型投入占用产出模型及其应用——中美贸易顺差透视[J].中国社会科学,2007(5):91-103. 被引量:322
  • 5上海WTO事务咨询中心.全球化下国际贸易价值链重估和统计方法改革研究[R].商务部委托课题:全球化下国际贸易价值链重估和统计方法改革研究,2012:5.
  • 6Hummels, D. , Ishii, J. , Yi, Kei - Mu. The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade [ J ]. Journal of In- ternational Economics ,2001, ( 54 ) :75 - 96.
  • 7Koopman, R. , Wang, Z. , Wei, S. J.. How Much Chinese Export Is Really Made in China : Assessing Foreign and Domes- tic Value- added in Gross Export[ R ]. NBER Working Paper,2008, No. 14109.
  • 8Daudin, G. , Rifflart. C. , Schweisguth, D.. Who Produces for Whom in the World Economy? Canadian Journal of Economics [J].2011 ,(4) :1403 - 1437.
  • 9Koopman,R. , Wang,Z. , Wei,S. J.. Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains [ R ]. NBER Working Paper,2010, No. 16426.
  • 10Koopman, R. , Wang,Z. , Wei,S. J.. Estimating Domestic Content in Exports When Processing Trade Pervasive [ J ]. Jour- nal of Development Economics,2012, (99) :178 - 189.

共引文献801

同被引文献25

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部