期刊文献+

可废止逻辑结构化论辩系统的研究 被引量:1

A Study on Defeasible Logic Argumentation System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论辩体现了人们处理冲突的信息、观点、意见等时的一种重要的认知能力,这种能力从逻辑角度可被称为非单调推理能力。如何为这种能力建立可计算的模型是当代人工智能领域中的热点议题,但主流的研究并未重视论证的逻辑特点。近年来,论辩的结构化研究成为新兴议题,借助于逻辑语言为论辩提供更细节化的形式表达,但现有系统在非单调推理刻画方面仍存在不足。在已有研究的基础上,本文尝试从可废止逻辑出发构造一个新的结构化论辩系统DLA,为结构化论辩的进一步探索提供思路。 Arguing reflect cognitive ability of humans in dealing with conflicting information,viewpoints and opinions.This ability can be referred to as a non-monotonic reasoning ability from a logical perspective.How to build a computable model for this capability has been the subject of intense inquiry in artificial intelligence in the past two decades.However,the logical characteristics of argumentation was neglected in the mainstream argumentation research.In recent years,the study of structured arguments has become an emerging topic by using of logic tools to provide more detailed characterization,but the typical systems still have shortcomings in expressing non-monotonic reasoning.Based on the existing research,this paper attempts to construct a new structured argumentation system DLA by defeasible logic,and provides ideas for the further exploration of structural argumentation.
作者 应腾 黄华新 Teng Ying;Huaxin Huang(Law School, Zhejiang University City College;Department of Philosophy, Zhejiang University;Center for the Study of Language and Cognition, Zhejiang University)
出处 《逻辑学研究》 CSSCI 2018年第4期21-36,共16页 Studies in Logic
基金 杭州市哲学社会科学规划项目"基于论证结构的论辩系统"(2016RCZX17) 浙江大学城市学院教师科研基金项目"面向政治辩论的结构化论辩系统"(JYB17010) 上海市哲学社会科学规划项目"间接言语行为的博弈逻辑研究"(2017EZX008)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献27

  • 1J. Pollock. Defeasible Reasoning [J]. Cognitive Science, 1987, 11(4): 481-518.
  • 2G. Antonelli. Non-monotonic Logic [EB/OL]. [2010-04-14/2015- 06-05]. http'J/plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-nonmonot onic/.
  • 3P. M. Dung. On the Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fundamental Role in Non-monotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and N-person Game [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1995,77 : 321-357.
  • 4T.J.M. Bench-Capon & P. Dunne. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2007, 171: 619-641.
  • 5B. Liao, L. Jin & R. Koons. Dynamics of ArgumentationSystems: A Division-Based Method [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 175:1790-1814.
  • 6B. Liao, H. Huang. Partial Semantics of Argumentation: Basic Properties and Empirical Results [J]. Journal of Logic and Computation,2013,23(3): 541-562.
  • 7P. Dunne, A. Hunter, et al. Weighted Argument Systems: Basic Definitions, Algorithms, and Complexity Results [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2011, 175: 457-486.
  • 8C. Cayrol, M.C. Lagasquie-Schiex. On the Acceptability of Argument in Bipolar Argumentation Framework [J]. In Proceeding of the 8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQAU-2005), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3571, Sprin~:er-Verla~, 2005: 378-389.
  • 9T.J.M Bench-Capon. Persuasion in Pratical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Framework [J]. Logic and Computation, 2003, 13 (3): 429-448.
  • 10H. Prakken, G.Vreeswijk. Logics for defeasible argumentation [C]//D. Gabby & F. Guenthner (eds.). Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol.4. Netherlands: Kluwer, 2002:219- 318.

共引文献4

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部