期刊文献+

不同切口方式对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠剖宫产术后并发症的影响 被引量:6

Effect of different incision methods on complications of cesarean section after re-pregnancy of scar uterus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究不同切口方式对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠剖宫产术后并发症的影响。方法 148例剖宫产手术产妇,按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组74例。观察组产妇采取横切口进行分娩,对照组产妇采取竖切口进行分娩。观察比较两组产妇切口愈合情况及术后并发症发生情况。结果两组产妇切口愈合情况比较,差异具有统计学意义(Z=2.573, P<0.05)。观察组产妇的并发症发生率为4.05%(3/74),显著低于对照组的13.51%(10/74),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采取横切口方式进行瘢痕子宫再次妊娠剖宫产术术后出现并发症的几率以及严重程度显著低于竖切口,在临床中通过科学的方式预防处理,可以提升治疗效果,在临床中值得广泛应用。 Objective To study the effect of different incision methods on complications of cesarean section after re-pregnancy of scar uterus.Methods A total of 148 cesarean section puerpera were divided by random number method into control group and observation group,with 74 cases in each group.The observation group received delivery mode of transverse incision,and the control group received delivery mode of vertical incision.The incision healing condition and occurrence of postoperative complications between the two groups were observed and compared.Results Both groups had statistically significant difference in incision healing condition(Z=2.573,P<0.05).The observation group had significantly lower incidence of complications as 4.05%(3/74)than 13.51%(10/74)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion By transverse incision method,the probability and severity of complications after cesarean section of the uterus re-pregnancy is significantly lower than that of the vertical incision.It can be improved in clinical practice by scientific methods,and it is worthy of widespread application in clinical practice.
作者 姜雪琴 JIANG Xue-qin(Dongtai Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Dongtai 224200,China)
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2018年第24期20-21,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠剖宫产术 术后并发症 临床研究 Re-pregnancy of scar uteru Postoperative complications Clinical study
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献67

  • 1余青萍.新式剖宫产术后腹腔粘连情况分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(10):1221-1222. 被引量:18
  • 2马彦彦,祝新利,董悦,王艳琴,郑之敏,张荣君,许艳,赵娟娟.不同术式剖宫产术后二次开腹手术时盆腹腔粘连情况比较[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(11):729-731. 被引量:62
  • 3谢建英,黄亚容,吴英姿,陈映缄.加强健康教育 降低剖宫产率[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(1):64-65. 被引量:15
  • 4Paré E,Quinones JN,Macones GA,et al.Vaginal birth after caesarean section versus elective repeat caesarean section:assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes[J].BJOG,2006,113(1):75-85.
  • 5Guise JM,Denman MA,Emeis C,et al.Vaginal birth after cesarean:new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,115(6):1267-1278.
  • 6胡仲任,庄红梅,陈菁.我院174例疤痕子宫妊娠分娩方式分析[J].中国优生优育,2011,17(5):289-290.
  • 7Baron J, Weintraub A Y, Eshkoli T, et al. The consequences of previous uterine scar dehiscence and cesarean delivery on subsequent births [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2014,126 ( 2 ) : 120-122.
  • 8Yasmin S, Sadaf J, Fatima N. Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment[ J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2011,21 (9) :522-526.
  • 9Allornuvor G,Xue M,Zhu X,et al. The definition,aetiolo gy, presentation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scar defects [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2013, 33 (8) :759-763.
  • 10Bwucher G, Dolley P, I.evy thissier S, et al. Maternal ben efits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat cae sarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 2012,41 (8) :708-726.

共引文献121

同被引文献57

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部