国内期刊自引与专利自引研究进展的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Researches on Journal Self-citation and Patent Self-citation in China

[目的/意义]通过期刊自引和专利自引的对比研究,丰富引文分析理论。[方法/过程]从相关研究的发展轨迹、学科分布、机构分布、主题内容4个方面对国内期刊自引和专利自引进行了对比分析。[结果/结论]期刊自引主要以期刊杂志和作者为研究对象,专利自引主要以企业、专利权人、技术为研究对象;期刊自引反映著者学术研究的发展道路、研究方向及研究过程,专利自引是技术创新的重要体现,反映技术主体在其后期产出的专利中对前期产出专利的引用情况;期刊自引率在期刊评价理论体系中已经得到了广泛的应用,并衍生出平均自引率、自被引率等论证,但是国内科技论文的过度自引现象需要改善;专利自引的相关理论已经在纳米、虚拟现实交互技术等技术密集型领域得到应用,把握专利自引行为中蕴含的深层含义,对企业的发展具有重要意义。

[Purpose/significance]The paper is to enrich the theory of citation analysis by comparing journal self-citation with patent self-citation.[Method/process]This paper makes a comparative analysis of journal self-citation and patent self-citation in China from four aspects of development trajectory,subject distribution,institute distribution and subject content.[Result/conclusion]Journal self-citation mainly takes journals and authors as research objects,and patent self-citation mainly focuses on enterprises,patentees and technologies.Journal self-citation reflects the development path,direction and process of the author’s academic research,and patent self-citation is an important embodiment of technology innovation and reflects the reference of the inventors’later patents to their earlier patents.Self-citation rate of journal has been widely applied in the theory of journal evaluation,including its derivatives of average self-citation rate and self-cited rate,but the excessive self-citation of sci-tech papers in China needs to be improved.The related theories of patent self-citation have been applied in the fields of nanotechnology,virtual reality interaction and other technology intensive fields,and it has a great significance for the development of enterprises to grasp the deep meaning of patent self-citation.