期刊文献+

高血压病对急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者主动脉内球囊反搏辅助下行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗预后的影响 被引量:16

The effect of hypertension on prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock receiving primary coronary intervention assisted by intra-aortic balloon pump
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察高血压病对急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)并发心源性休克(cardiac shock,CS)患者在主动脉内球囊反搏(intra-aortic balloon pump,IABP)辅助下行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)预后的影响。方法回顾性分析2010年3月至2016年1月在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院心内科因AMI并发CS在IABP辅助下行急诊PCI的100例患者。根据是否有高血压病史分为高血压病组(57例)、非高血压病组(43例)。收集患者基线资料,比较两组患者围术期、术后3个月及1年的出血事件和主要不良心脑血管事件(major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events,MACCE),包括支架内血栓形成、支架内再狭窄、再发心肌梗死、心血管事件死亡、卒中及全因死亡事件发生情况。结果两组患者年龄、性别、慢性肾功能不全比例、吸烟史、心血管疾病家族史、术前血红蛋白水平、血小板计数比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。高血压病组合并2型糖尿病比例(33.3%比14.0%,P=0.027)、卒中史比例(24.6%比2.3%,P=0.002)均大于非高血压病组,差异均有统计学意义。与非高血压病组相比,高血压病组围术期、术后3个月及1年的大出血事件发生率、心血管事件死亡率、卒中比例、全因死亡率及总MACCE发生率较高,但差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。Cox多因素回归分析结果显示,高血压病与AMI并发CS患者在IABP辅助下行急诊PCI的心血管事件死亡率及全因死亡率无显著相关性。结论虽然高血压病对AMI并发CS患者在IABP辅助下行急诊PCI预后的影响不显著,但仍需对合并高血压病的患者进行监护,警惕出血事件和MACCE的发生。 Objective To explore the effect of hypertension on prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI)and cardiac shock(CS)who received emergency revascularization assisted by intra-aortic balloon pump(IABP).Methods We retrospectively analyzed100patients with AMI and CS who had received emergency revascularization assisted by IABP between March,2010to January,2016.The patients were divided into the hypertension group(n=57)and the non-hypertension group(n=43)according to the history of hypertension.Bleeding events and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events(MACCE)including stent thrombosis,recurrent myocardial infraction,cardiac death,stroke and all-cause death during perioperative period and at3months and one year after PCI.Results There were no signifi cant diff erences between the two groups in baseline information except the history of diabetes(33.3%vs.14%,P=0.027)and stroke(24.6%vs.2.3%,P=0.002).The rate of bleeding events and MACCE had no diff erence between the two groups(P>0.05).Cox regression analysis showed that there was no signifi cant correlation between clinical outcomes of emergency coronary revascularization assisted by IABP in AMI patients combined with CS and hypertension.Conclusions Hypertension showed no signifi cant eff ect on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock receiving emergency revascularization assisted by intraaortic balloon pump,special care should be implemented to AMI patients comorbid with hypertension in order to reduce the incidence of hemorrhage and MACCE.
作者 吴佳纬 胡昊 李丹 陈鸿武 马礼坤 WU Jia-wei;HU Hao;LI Dan;CHEN Hong-wu;MA Li-kun(Department of Cardiology,The First Affi liated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230000,China)
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2018年第12期675-679,共5页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
基金 安徽省公益性技术应用研究联动计划(15011d04032) 安徽省科技攻关计划(1604a0802074)
关键词 高血压病 急性心肌梗死 心源性休克 主动脉内球囊反搏 Hypertension Acute myocardial infarction Cardiogenic shock Intra-aortic balloon pump
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Holmes DJ. Cardiogenic shock: a lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction. Rev Cardiovasc Med ,2003,4 : 131-135.
  • 2Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, et al. Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 2010,304: 867 -874.
  • 3Ohman EM, Hochman JS. Aortic counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: physiologically important but does the patient benefit? Am Heart J,2001,141:889-892.
  • 4Rognoni A, Cavallino C, Lupi A, et al. Aortic counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock during acute myocardial infarction. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther,2014,12:913-917.
  • 5Hochman JS, Buller CE, Sleeper LA, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock? J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,36:1063-1070.
  • 6Sjauw KD,Engstrom AE, Vis MM, et al. Efficacy and timing of intra-aortic counterpulsation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Neth Heart J ,2012,20:402-409.
  • 7Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II ) : final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet,2013,382:1638-1645.
  • 8Cheng JM, den Uil CA, Hoeks SE, et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta- analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J,2009,30:2102-2108.
  • 9Olasinska-Wisniewska A, Mularek-Kubzdela T, Grajek S, et al. Indications, results of therapy and factors which influence survival in patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Kardiol Pol,2008,66:950-955,956-957.
  • 10傅向阳,李公信,刘映峰,叶文胜,李志梁,丁明学,吴宏超,魏向荣,赵霞.闭塞的右冠状动脉延迟再通对心律失常转归的影响[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,1999,7(3):107-109. 被引量:7

共引文献23

同被引文献152

引证文献16

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部