口腔种植修复与常规修复牙列缺失的效果比较

Comparison of Oral Implant Restoration and Conventional Restoration for Dentition Defect

目的比较口腔种植修复与常规修复牙列缺失的临床效果。方法将62例牙列缺失患者按治疗方法的不同分为常规组(n=27)和种植组(n=35)。常规组采用传统修复,种植组采用口腔种植修复。观察2组治疗前、治疗后语言功能、咀嚼功能、固位功能的评分和美观满意度、舒适满意度及临床疗效。结果种植组总有效率为91.43%,明显高于常规组的66.67%(P<0.05)。2组治疗后语言功能、咀嚼功能、固位功能评分均高于治疗前,且种植组上述评分均高于常规组(均P<0.05),种植组美观、舒适的总满意率均高于常规组(均P<0.05)。结论采用口腔种植修复牙列缺失较常规修复效果更好,且更美观、舒适。

Objective To compare the clinical effects of oral implant restoration and conventional restoration on dentition defect.Methods Sixty-two patients with dentition defect were assigned to receive either oral implant restoration(n=35)or conventional restoration(n=27).Linguistic function,masticatory function,retention function,aesthetic satisfaction,comfortable satisfaction and clinical efficacy were observed before and after treatment.Results The total effective rate in implant group was higher than that in conventional group(91.43%vs66.67%,P<0.05).The scores of linguistic,masticatory and retention functions measured after treatment were higher than those measured before treatment in both groups,and those in implant group were higher than those in conventional group after treatment(P<0.05).In addition,the aesthetic and comfortable satisfaction rates in implant group were higher than those in conventional group(P<0.05).Conclusion Dental implantation is more effective,beautiful and comfortable than conventional implantation for dentition defect.