摘要
我国室内家具污染致害情况屡见不鲜,相关侵权诉讼在各地法院亦有审理,但关于此类案件的案由不一,有的案件以产品侵权为案由,有的案件以环境侵权为案由,导致法院据此审判的结果相去甚远。案由分歧的实质是对室内家具污染的责任形式认识不统一,目前学界的观点主要分为两类:产品责任、环境污染责任。通过对两种责任的相关制度进行比较,进而对受害人、加害人、司法者等相关主体的利益进行衡量分析,认为室内家具污染致人损害案件的生产者责任应归为环境污染责任,这样更能达到利益均衡。
It is common that the damage caused by indoor furniture pollution initiates the related tort litigation in China.Notably,there is no unified nature of cases on indoor furniture pollution.Some district courts af-firmed that indoor furniture pollution is applicable to product tort liability,others courts classified such cases as environmental tort.Therefore,the lawsuit results may he at opposite poles.Essentially,conflicts in judging the nature of cases can he attributed to the disagreements in forms of liability which fall into Iwo categories:product tort liability and environmental tort liability.Through the comparison of the relative systems and meas-uring the interests of victims,offenders and other relevant parties,we hold that the producer liability for cases of human damages caused by indoor furniture pollution should he classified as environmental tort.
作者
田其云
童丽
TIAN Qiyun;TONGF Li(School of Law & Political Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100,China)
出处
《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2018年第6期38-46,96,共10页
Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
基金
青岛市社科规划项目"青岛生态安全司法中的利益衡量"(QDSKL1401100)
关键词
室内家具污染
生产者责任
产品责任
环境污染责任
indoor furniture pollution
producer liability
product liability
environmental pollution liability