期刊文献+

澳大利亚与环印度洋联盟的制度变迁 被引量:7

Australia and the Indian Ocean Rim Association's Institutional Change
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着21世纪印度洋的战略重要性逐步上升,印度洋地区主义受到地区大国的重视。在此背景下,澳大利亚推动了环印度洋地区唯一部长级地区论坛的制度变迁,从环印度洋地区合作联盟转型为环印度洋联盟。本文主要基于交易成本模型来分析澳大利亚在制度变迁中的作用。首先,本文从成员资格、议题领域、集中程度、灵活性与控制权等方面分析制度变迁的内容。该制度的议题领域从开放地区主义转向海事地区主义,集中化程度有所提升,同时保持协商一致的决策程序,偏好达成非正式协议。其次,制度变迁的促进因素包括澳大利亚与印度、印度尼西亚关系的透明度增加,以及海事议题不确定性的上升。再次,与亚太经合组织相比,环印度洋联盟呈现交易频率低与国家异质性高的特点。这导致其在贸易自由化议题的弱化,并且维持高度的灵活性与分散的控制权。最后,对环印度洋联盟的低制度化水平需要破除两个认识误区,即弱联系无用论与低有效性论。 Since the strategic importance of India Ocean gradually rose in the21st century,the Indian O-cean regionalism has gained continuous attention from regional powers.In the context,Australia endeavored to promote the institutional change of the sole ministerial regional forum in this region,from the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation(IOR-ARC)to the Indian Ocean Rim Association(IORA).Based on the Transaction Cost Model,the article mainly dissects the role of Australia in IORA's institutional change.First of all,the paper analyzes the content of institutional change in terms of membership,issue ar-eas,concentration,flexibility,and the right of control.The institution shifted its main issue areas on maritime regionalism from open regionalism,and increased the level of concentration,while maintaining the decision-making process on the basis of consensus and the preference for informal agreement.Secondly,improved transparency of ties between Australia with India and Indonesia,and the rising uncertainty of maritime agendas constitute the driving force for the institutional change.Thirdly,compared with the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation,IORA,with a high degree of flexibility and decentralized control,is characterized by low transaction frequency and high heterogeneity among members,which weaken the importance of issue areas concerning trade liberalization.Finally,it is a necessity to get rid of two misunderstandings about IORA's low-level institutionalization,namely no utility of weak ties and low effectiveness.
作者 卓振伟 ZHUO Zhenwei(Renmin University of China,Beijing100872,China)
机构地区 中国人民大学
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第12期12-23,共12页 Pacific Journal
关键词 澳大利亚 环印度洋合作 交易成本 制度变迁 海事地区主义 Australia the Indian Ocean rim cooperation transaction cost institutional change maritime regionalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1肖枫.环印度洋地区合作联盟[J].当代亚太,1997(5):73-75. 被引量:2
  • 2缪圣赐.ICFA在2006年度会上提出坚决反对禁止在公海的底拖网作业[J].现代渔业信息,2007,22(4):35-35. 被引量:2
  • 3罗雄飞.“环印度洋经济合作区”的发展及其对中国的影响[J].世界经济与政治,1997(3):68-71. 被引量:1
  • 4"Research agendas for the Indian Ocean Region",Journal of the Indian Ocean Region,Vol.6,No.1,p.2.
  • 5David Brewster," Australia and India:The Indian Ocean and the limit of strategic convergence",Australian Journal of International Affairs,Vol.64,No.5,November 2010,p.549.
  • 6Dennis Rumley,Timothy Doyle & Sanjay Chaturvedi,"‘ Securing' the Indian Ocean? Competing Regional Security Constructions",Indo-Pacific Governance Research Centre Policy Brief,Issue,3April 2012.
  • 7Don Berlin,"Sea Power,Land power and the Indian Ocean",Journal of the Indian Ocean Region,Vol.6,No.1,June 2010,p.57.
  • 8Sergei DeSilva-Ranasinghe," The Indian Ocean Region and Australia's National Interests",Future Directions International,p.6.
  • 9Sam Bateman,"Anthony Bergin:Our Western Front:Australia and the Indian Ocean",Australia Strategy Policy Institute,March 2010,p.3.
  • 10Saloni Saili,"India-Australia:Ushering in an Era of Maritime Prosperity in the Indian Ocean Region",Strategic paper,17 August 2012,p.4.

共引文献59

同被引文献64

引证文献7

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部