期刊文献+

英美刑法中蓄意结果因果关系规则之思考

Reflection of Intended Consequences Causation Doctrine in Anglo American Criminal Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 因果关系是刑法的核心问题,因为这一问题的复杂性,两大法系不断修正旧学说与创设新理论,目的就是为司法实践解决该问题提供理论依据。在解决因果关系的问题上,英美刑法的因果关系理论更注重解决方法的高效性与合理性,从事实因果关系与法律因果关系双层次综合考量各因素与危害结果之间的关系,最终确定具有刑法学意义的可责性的实行行为。"蓄意结果规则"就是这一思考方式的具体体现。比较研究两大法系对于同一问题的不同分析逻辑方式和解决路径,可以为我国司法实践提供新的思路。 Causation is the core of the criminal law.Because of the complexity of the problem,the two major legal systems constantly revise the old theories and establish new theories.The purpose is to provide a theoretical basis for judicial practice to solve the problem.The Anglo American law system to resolve the causation problems pays more attention to the solution efficiency and rationality,from the double level system of factual causation and legal causation,comprehensively considering the relationship of various factors and the damage results,and ultimately determine the criminal act with culpability.The principle of intended consequences doctrine is the concrete embodiment of this thinking mode.A comparative study of the two different legal systems on the same issue of different logic analysis and solutions can provide new ideas for China's judicial practice.
作者 吴浩 WU Hao(School of Law,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350)
机构地区 南开大学法学院
出处 《科学.经济.社会》 2018年第4期86-92,共7页 Science Economy Society
基金 天津社会科学规划课题"中美刑法因果关系基础原理与司法认定规则比较研究"(TJFX12-005)
关键词 蓄意结果规则 事实因果关系 法律因果关系 介入因素 intended consequences doctrine factual cause legal cause intervening cause
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献4

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部