期刊文献+

第四轮学科评估指标体系的变化、问题及启示 被引量:8

Changes, Problems and Enlightenment of the Fourth Round Disciplinary Evaluation Index System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学科评估对促进学科发展和学科建设具有重要的作用。由教育部学位与研究生教育发展中心组织的全国第四轮学科评估于2016年4月启动,2017年2月公布评估结果。对第四轮学科评估的指标体系进行分析后发现,对比上一轮学科评估指标体系,第四轮学科评估指标体系在关注人才培养质量、凸显学科特色等诸多方面有显著进步,但同时也存在一些问题。在未来的学科评估中,应当及时公布下一轮评估指标体系并做出详细说明,制定合理的中文期刊指标,合理分配"归属度"权重,对开设数量较少的学科给予特殊支持,评估结果要慎重与政府拨款挂钩。 Disciplinary evaluation plays an important role in promoting the development of disciplines.The fourth round disciplinary evaluation organized by the China Academic Degrees&Graduate Education Development Center was launched in April 2016,and the results of the evaluation were published in February2017.This paper analyzes the index system of the fourth round of disciplinary evaluation,and finds that,compared with the third round disciplinary evaluation index system,the fourth round disciplinary evaluation index system has made great progress in paying attention to the quality of personnel training and highlighting the characteristics of the discipline.But at the same time,it also brought some problems.This paper argues that,in the future evaluation of the discipline,it is necessary to promptly announce the next round evaluation index system,and make a detailed explanation,formulate reasonable Chinese journal indicators,allocate the“attribution”weight reasonably,give special support for disciplines with a small quantity,and link the results of the evaluation with the government grants carefully,etc.
作者 王晨 刘虹 Wang Chen;Liu Hong(Institute of Higher Education, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092;Business School, University of Shanghai for Science & Technology,200093)
出处 《上海教育评估研究》 2018年第6期6-10,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
基金 上海理工大学人文社科攀登计划项目"教育现代化背景下的管办评分离改革研究"(16HJPD-B07)
关键词 高等教育 学科评估 指标体系 Higher education Disciplinary evaluation Index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献17

共引文献79

同被引文献65

引证文献8

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部