摘要
2016年4月教育部启动第四轮学科评估,又恰逢"双一流"建设,社会反响以及参加程度达到新的高潮。上海市共有346个学科参加,A区学科数位列全国各省(市)第二位。文章通过比对上海市学科评估结果和"双一流"建设学科名单,发现二者有较大重合,但也呈现出一定的差异。第四轮学科评估结果对于"双一流"建设的价值不仅在于肯定和激励高校的学科建设,也在于高校以评促改、以评促建,为一流学科和一流大学建设提供参考。
The launching of the fourth round of subject assessment in April2016coincided with the promotion of the“Double First-rate”construction.Therefore,the social response and participation reached a new high.There are346subjects of Shanghai universities got on the list,and the number of A parts(A+,A,A-)rates the second among all the provinces.By cross-comparing the results of the fourth round of subject assessment in Shanghai with the list of“Double First-rate”construction disciplines,this paper finds that the two lists overlap partially and exist some differences.The value of the results of the fourth round of subject evaluation for the first-rate disciplines construction not only has an incentive effect,but also is beneficial for universities to find deficiencies,and thus promotes the reform and construction in“Double First-rate”construction.
作者
樊诗慧
吴伟
Fan Shihui;Wu Wei(Institute of Higher Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092;Institute of China’s Science, Technology and Education Policy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058)
出处
《上海教育评估研究》
2018年第6期17-19,25,共4页
Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
关键词
第四轮学科评估
高等教育
双一流
The Fourth Round of Subject Assessment
Higher education
Double First-rate