期刊文献+

血清标志物方程估算血液透析患者残肾功能及其临床应用价值

Clinical application of serum markers for estimation of residual kidney function in hemodialysis patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨使用血清β-微量蛋白(β-TP)和β_2-微球蛋白(β2-M)预测方程估算血液透析(HD)患者的残肾功能,检出其残尿素清除率(KRU)值>2.00 ml/(min·1.73 m^2)的患者。方法用新KRU方程和尿常规方法估算42例HD的终末期肾病新患者残肾功能。结果 KRU常规方法测量值和方程估算值之间的中位数偏离为0.30 ml/(min·1.73 m^2)。用KRU估算值>2.00 ml/(min·1.73 m^2)作为截断值检出实测KRU值>2.00 ml/(min·1.73 m^2)患者的受者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积为0.91,其敏感性为71%、特异性为96%。结论无需采集尿液,该方程即可检出KRU值>2.00 ml/(min·1.73 m^2)的HD患者。 Objective To investigate novel predictive equations based onβ-trac protein(β-TP)andβ2 Microglobulim(β2-M)for estimation of residual kidney function in hemodialysis(HD)patients.Methods Novel KRU equations and conventional method were performed in 42 HD patients with end-stage renal disease.Results Median bias of KRU between conventional method and novel equation was 0.30 ml/(min·1.73 m^2).With cut-off estimated KRU>2.00 ml/(min·1.73 m^2),area under receiving operator characteristic curve for identifying patient was 0.91;sensitivity was 71%and specificity was 96%.Conclusionsβ-TP andβ2-M based novel equation may be a promising tool to identify HD patients with KRU>2.00 ml/(min·1.73 m^2)without urine collection.
作者 刘进 侯静 张帆 陈昕 王玉洁 秦建华 钟华 Jin Liu;Jing Hou;Fan Zhang;Xin Chen;Yu-jie Wang;Jian-hua Qin;Hua Zhong(Department of Nephrology,the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou,Sichuan 646000,China;West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610041,China)
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS 2018年第36期79-82,共4页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 血液透析 β2–微球蛋白 β-微量蛋白 残肾功能 hemodialysis β2-microglobulin β-trace protein residual kidney function
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Goteh FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int, 1985, 28:526-534.
  • 2Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1993, 4: 1205-1213.
  • 3Alloatti S, Bosticardo G, Torazza MC, et al. Transcellular disequilibrium and intradialytic catabolism reduce the reliability of urea kinetic formulas. ASAIO Trans, 1989, 35: 328-330.
  • 4The European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association. Haemodialysis dose quantification: small solutes. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2002, 17 Suppl 7: 17-21.
  • 5Smye SW, Dunderdale E, Brownridge G, et al. Estimation of treatment dose in high-efficiency haemodialysis. Nephron, 1994, 67: 24-29.
  • 6Smye SW, Tattersall JE, Will EJ. Modeling the post-dialysis rebound: the reconciliation of current formulas. ASAIO J, 1999, 45: 562-567.
  • 7Spiegel DM, Baker L, Babcock S, et al. Haemodialysis urea rebound: the effect of increasing dialysis efficiency. Am J Kidney Dis, 1995, 25: 26-29.
  • 8Kapoian T, Steward CA, Sherman RA. Validation of a revised slow-stop flow recirculation method. Kidney Int, 1997, 52: 839-842.
  • 9Schneditz D, Kaufman AM, Polaschegg HD, et al. Cardiopulmonary recirculatiou during hemodialysis. Kidney Int, 1992, 42: 1450-1456.
  • 10Tattersall JE, DeTakats D, Chamney P, et al. The post- hemodialysis rebound: predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int, 1996, 50: 2094-2102.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部