期刊文献+

工作中的时间压力对员工工作幸福感的影响研究——个体特质调节焦点与服务型领导的三重交互作用 被引量:23

The Influence of Time Pressure at Work on Employee Work Well-being——The Three-way Interactions of Individual Trait Regulatory Focus and Servant Leadership
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在工作中,时间压力是难以避免的问题,时间压力对幸福感的影响尚存争议。文章结合特质调节焦点和服务型领导构建了三重交互模型,揭示了时间压力对员工工作幸福感影响的边界条件。通过以393名员工为样本的实证分析表明,当组织内存在服务型领导并且员工属于促进型调节焦点时,时间压力对员工工作幸福感的负向影响最弱,时间压力、特质调节焦点和服务型领导的三重交互作用显著。研究结论不仅拓展了时间压力影响的边界条件,还对未来时间压力领域研究有所启示,并且对于组织日常应对时间压力具有实践意义。 Time pressure is an unavoidable problem in workplace,and its impact on well-being is still controversial.By includ.ing trait regulatory focus and servant leadership,this paper develops a three-way interactions model to discusses the boundary conditions of the effect of time pressure on employee work well-being.The empirical analysis,based on the sample of 393 em.ployees,shows that the negative effect of time pressure on work well-being is lowest when the leadership is service-oriented and employees are the promotion regulatory focus in the organization,and the three-way interactions of time pressure,trait reg.ulatory focus and servant leadership are significant.The study conclusions not only expand the boundary conditions of the in.fluence of time pressure and have some enlightenment on future research of time pressure,but also have practical significance for organizations to deal with time pressure.
作者 宋锟泰 张正堂 赵李晶 陈钰瑶 SONG Kun-tai;ZHANG Zheng-tang;ZHAO Li-jing;CHEN Yu-yao(School of Business,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期160-168,共9页 East China Economic Management
基金 国家自然科学基金地区项目(71862019) 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(71802001)
关键词 时间压力 工作幸福感 调节焦点 服务型领导 time pressure work well-being regulatory focus servant leadership
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献52

  • 1王佳艺,胡安安.主观工作幸福感研究述评[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(8):49-55. 被引量:80
  • 2孙健敏等.《幸福社会:提升幸福感的多元视角》,中国人民大学出版社,2015年版.
  • 3Bakker A B. Towards a multilevel approach of employee well-being. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 2015, 24(6): 839-843.
  • 4Bakker A B, Demerouti E. The spillover-cmssover mode. In J. G. Grzywacz & E. Dememuti (Eds.). New frontiers in work and family research. New York: Psychology Press, 2013: 54-70.
  • 5Bakker A B, Oerlemans W. Subjective well-being in organizations. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011: 178-189.
  • 6Baldschun A. The six dimensions of child welfare employees ' occupational well- being. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2014, 4(4): 69-87.
  • 7Bretones F D, Gonzalez M J. Subjective and occupational well-being in a sample of Mexican workers. Social Indicators Research, 2011, 100(2): 273-285.
  • 8Dagenais-Desmarais V, Savoie A. What is psychological well-beIng, really? A grass roots approach from the orgonal sciences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2012, 13(4): 659-684.
  • 9Demo G, Paschoal T. Well-being at work scale: Exploratory and confmnatory validation in the United States comprising affective and cognitive components. Rio de Janeiro Research Journal, 2013, 11(7): 1-16.
  • 10Epitropaki O, Martin R. From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(4): 659-676.

共引文献30

同被引文献304

引证文献23

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部