期刊文献+

“内在价值”理论反思与生态伦理思想整合 被引量:1

Reflection on “Intrinsic Value” Theory and Integration of Ecological Ethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以自然"内在价值"确立人与自然之间的伦理关系,论证生态伦理的道德合理性根据,却难以得到以人的"内在价值"为核心的现代伦理文化接受和认同。但如果转换研究视角,从反思"现代性"的批评语境中,对人的"内在价值"进行实质性探析,能够发现疏离自然伦理维度的"现代性"伦理的意识形态话语,内在包含着无法解决的主观主义的道德心理困境。正是在超越"现代性"意识形态话语的批判性主题反思中,彰显出关于自然"内在价值"的论证对于现代社会伦理所具有的客观基础、人文意蕴和伦理意义。作为具有实践伦理学特质的生态伦理,以"内在价值"探讨为切入点,通过打破意识形态与乌托邦之间的"对称性破缺",为"绿色乌托邦"辩护,寻求人类中心主义与自然中心主义思想整合的生活基础。 To establish the ethical relationship between man and nature with natural“intrinsic value”,and to demonstrate the moral rationality of ecological ethics,it is hard to be accepted and identified by modern ethical culture that is based on human“intrinsic value”as the core.But if the thesis transforms the perspective of research,carries out substantive analysis of human's“intrinsic value”from the critical context of reflection on“modernity”,we can find inextricable moral psychological dilemma of subjectivism in the ideology of modernity ethics that alienates the natural ethics.It is the critical theme reflection of transcending the“modernity”ideology that highlights the objective basis,humanistic implication and ethical significance of the argument of natural“intrinsic value”for modern social ethics.With the discussion of“intrinsic value”as the breakthrough point,through breaking the“broken-symmetry”between ideology and Utopia,as an ecological ethics with the characteristics of practical ethics,it defends the“ecotopia”and seeks the life as basis of the integration of anthropocentrism and natural centralism.
作者 张彭松 ZHANG Peng-song(College of Philosophy, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China)
出处 《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期56-62,共7页 Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(17BKS120)
关键词 内在价值 生态伦理 整合 生活基础 intrinsic value ecological ethics integration life as basis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1亚里士多德 吴寿彭.形而上学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1959..
  • 2柯林武德.自然的观念[M].华夏出版社,1990.143.
  • 3马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,1995.103.
  • 4塞尔日·莫斯科维奇.还自然之魅—对生态运动的思考[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2005.92,23,295.
  • 5马丁·阿尔布劳.全球时代—超越现代性之外的国家和社会[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.212.
  • 6Kurt Bayertz,Self-enlightenment of Applied Ethics,in Ruth Chadwich and Doris Schroeder (ed.),Applied Ethics Critical Concepts in Philosophy,Routledge,London and New York,2002,P.40.
  • 7Tim Dare.Applied Ethics,Challenges to,in Ruth Chadwich and Doris Schroeder (ed.),Applied Ethics:Critical Concepts in Philosophy,Routledge,London and New York,2002,P.23.
  • 8Paul Johnston.The Contradictions of Modern Moral Philosophy:Ethics after Wittgenstein,Routledge,London and New York,1999,P.141.
  • 9Pierre Hadot.Philosophy as a Way of Life,edited and with an introduction by Arnold I.Davidson,Blackwell Publishing,1995,P.265.
  • 10Ruth Chadwich and Doris Schroeder (ed.),Applied Ethics:Critical Concepts in Philosophy,Routledge,London and New York,2002,P.1.

共引文献222

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部