期刊文献+

产时胎心监护减速区面积在新生儿酸中毒预测中的价值 被引量:5

Value of Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Retardation Area in the Prediction of Neonatal Acidosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的预测新生儿酸中毒应用产时胎心监护减速区面积的价值。方法回顾性分析我院2016年1月至2018年1月102例住院分娩产妇分娩前半小时的胎心监护图形的减速区面积,按照pH值进行分组,pH<7.2的产妇纳入酸中毒组,共13例,另外pH≥7.2的产妇纳入对照组,共89例,分析产时胎心监护减速区面积和新生儿脐动脉血气的相关性。结果酸中毒组新生儿窒息发生率7.69%,明显高于对照组0%(P<0.05),酸中毒组分娩前30 min减速区面积明显大于对照组(P<0.05)。结论利用产时胎心监护减速区面积预测新生儿酸中毒存在较高特异性,不过缺乏良好敏感性,有必要与更多临床指标相结合进行判断,以保证更高的准确性。 Objective To investigate the value of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring retardation area in the prediction of neonatal acidosis.Methods At 0.5 h before delivery,fetal heart rate monitoring retardation area of 102 cases of pregnant women in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed,they were divided according to the pH value,pregnant women with pH<7.2 were seen as the acidosis group(n=13),other pregnant women with pH≥7.2 were seen as the control group(n=89),analyze the relation between the intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring retardation area and newborn umbilical arterial blood gas.Results Neonatal asphyxia rate of the acidosis group(7.69%)was significantly higher than that in the control group(0%),P<0.05,30 min before delivery,retardation area in the acidosis group was significantly larger than that in the control group,P<0.05.Conclusion The application of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring retardation area in the prediction of neonatal acidosis has higher specificity,but lack of good sensibility,combination?judgement with clinical indexes should be taken attention,in order to guarantee higher accuracy.
作者 李兰轲 刘永丽 魏春花 Li Lanke;Liu Yongli;Wei Chunhua(Obstetrics and Gynecology,CTM Hospital of Sui County,Sui County 476900,China)
出处 《哈尔滨医药》 2018年第6期534-535,共2页 Harbin Medical Journal
关键词 新生儿 酸中毒 产时胎心监护 减速区面积 预测 Newborn Acidosis Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring Retardation area Prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献45

  • 1魏晓萍,钟利若,徐宏里.第二产程胎心监护的意义及与胎儿预后的关系[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(2):165-167. 被引量:22
  • 2齐玲,黎玉红.280例胎心监护在第二产程中的临床意义分析[J].宁夏医学杂志,2007,29(6):553-555. 被引量:1
  • 3Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 NationalInstitute of Child Health and Human Development workshopreport on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions,interpretation, and research guidelines[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2008, 112(3):661-666.
  • 4Reddy A, Moulden M, Redman CW. Antepartum high-frequency fetal heart rate sinusoidal rhythm: computerizeddetection and fetal anemia[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009,200(4):407.el-407.e6.
  • 5ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG PracticeBulletin No. 145: Antepartum Fetal Surveillance[J]. ObstetGynecol, 2014, 124(1) :182-92.
  • 6Ayoubi JM, Audibert F, Vial M, et al. Fetal heart rate andsurvival of the very premature newborn[J]. Am J ObstetGynecol, 2002, 187(4):1026-1030.
  • 7Tan KH, Smyth RM, Wei X. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation forfacilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing[CD]. Cochrane DatabaseSyst Rev, 2013, 12:CD002963.
  • 8Cousins LM, Poeltler DM, Faron S,et al. Nonstress testing at </=32.0 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial comparing differentassessment criteria[J], Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207:311.el-311.e7.
  • 9Bishop EH. Fetal acceleration test[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,1981,141(8):905-909.
  • 10Lavin JP Jr, Miodovnik M, Barden TP. Relationship of nonstresstest reactivity and gestational age[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1984,63(3):338-344.

共引文献144

同被引文献47

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部