期刊文献+

创造力测评中的评分者效应 被引量:4

Rater effects in creativity assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 创造力测评中的评分者效应(ratereffects)是指在创造性测评过程中,由于评分者参与而对测评结果造成的影响。评分者效应本质上源于评分者内在认知加工的不同,具体体现在其评分结果的差异。本文首先概述了评分者认知的相关研究,以及评分者、创作者、社会文化因素对测评的影响。其次在评分结果层面梳理了评分者一致性信度的指标及其局限,以及测验概化理论和多面Rasch模型在量化、控制该效应中的应用。最后基于当前研究仍存在的问题,指出了未来可能的研究方向,包括深化评分者认知研究、整合不同层面评分者效应的研究,以及拓展创造力测评方法和技术等。 Rater effects refer to the impact of different raters’ idiosyncrasies in their behaviors on the evaluation results in creativity assessment. Rater effects are due to the difference in raters’ cognitive process of the evaluation, which are externally reflected in the difference of their scorings. This article first summarizes the studies of rater cognition and other influencing factors on creativity assessment, including characteristics of raters, information of creators and socio-cultural factors. It further examines inter-rater reliability indexes and their limitations, as well as the applications of Generalization Theory and Many-Facet Rasch Model in quantifying and controlling of rater effects. Finally, this paper specifies directions of future research based on the existing limitations, including deepening the investigation on rater cognition in creativity assessment, integrating the studies of rater effects on different levels, and developing new methods and techniques of creativity assessment.
作者 韩建涛 刘文令 庞维国 HAN Jiantao;LIU Wenling;PANG Weiguo(School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;School of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China;School of Literature Media and Educational Science, Chaohu College, Chaohu 238000, China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第1期171-180,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJC190008)
关键词 评分者效应 创造力 主观评分 评分者认知 评分者一致性 creativity subjective scoring rater effects rater cognition inter-rater agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献157

  • 1罗冠中.Rasch模型及其发展[J].教育研究与实验,1992(2):40-43. 被引量:5
  • 2王烨,余荣军,周晓林.创造性研究的有效工具——远距离联想测验(RAT)[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(6):734-738. 被引量:17
  • 3宋晓辉,施建农.创造力测量手段——同感评估技术(CAT)简介[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(6):739-744. 被引量:33
  • 4Keats J A.Rasch的测验理论[J].心理学报,1990,3:267-271.
  • 5Al-Owidha, A. A. (2007). A comparison of the Rasch model and the three-parameter logistic model applied to the quantitative subtest of the General Aptitude Test, Saudi Arabia (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Denver, Colorado, USA.
  • 6Andrich, D. (2004). Controversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Medical Care, 42, 1-16.
  • 7Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
  • 8Bowles, R. P., & Ram, N. (2006). Using Rasch measurement to investigate volleyball skills and inform coaching. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7(1), 39-54.
  • 9Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., & Ho, Y. H. (2009). Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 369-388.
  • 10Custer, M., Omar, M. H., & Pomplun, M. (2006). Vertical scaling with the Rasch model utilizing default and tight convergence settings with WINSTEPS and BILOG-MG. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(2), 133-149.

共引文献113

同被引文献35

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部