期刊文献+

对齐(Alignment)——一种新的多群组分析法 被引量:4

Alignment: A new method for multiple-group analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 进行跨群组的因素均值比较需要检验测量工具的可比较性,常见的做法是使用多群组CFA检验各群组的截距恒定性,但截距恒定假设因其过于苛刻而往往无法满足。对齐法在这一背景下应运而生,通过检验构置恒定模型中参数的近似恒定性而进行跨群组因素均值比较。文章介绍了多群组CFA和对齐法的原理,运用某省4个学校的本科生职业价值观研究实例来演示如何在Mplus软件中使用对齐法进行研究,并总结了对齐法的优势与局限,回顾了对齐法近年的研究进展。 Comparing the latent factor means across groups need to test the comparability of the instrument. Researchers usually test the scalar invariance to achieve this goal but often get unsatisfactory results. The alignment is proposed under this background. It allows the comparison of the latent factor means by testing the approximate invariance of the configural model parameters and has become a significant complement to multiple-group CFA. This article gives a detailed description of the multiple-group CFA and alignment, summarizes the research procedures and points to which researchers need to pay attention when applying alignment, uses an undergraduates’ work value data to illustrate how to use alignment to do a research with Mplus. In the end, this article summarizes the advantages and limitations of alignment and reviews its research developments and empirical applications.
作者 温聪聪 伍伟平 林光杰 WEN Congcong;WU Weiping;LIN Guangjie(Overseas Education College/International College, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China;School of Journalism and Communication, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第1期181-189,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 多群组分析 多群组CFA 测量恒定性 对齐法 蒙特卡洛模拟研究 multiple-group analysis multiple-group CFA measurement invariance alignment Monte Carlo simulation study
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献67

  • 1刘军,吴维库.心理测量平衡性研究与实例[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):170-174. 被引量:6
  • 2李锐,宋铁英.国内网络调查研究分析[J].情报科学,2005,23(6):891-895. 被引量:19
  • 3方佳明,邵培基,粟婕,张谦,田禹.基于网络的问卷调查回复率影响因素实证研究[J].管理评论,2006,18(10):12-17. 被引量:14
  • 4王军 张云云.我国网络调查的特点、问题及其对策[J].暨南学报:哲学社会科学版,2001,(2).
  • 5Stanton J M. An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Personnel Psychology, 1998, 51 : 709 - 725
  • 6Webster J, Compeau D. Computer- assisted versus paper - and - pencil administration of questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1996, 28:567 -576
  • 7Barak A, Cohen L. Empirical examination of an online version of the self- directed search. Journal of Career Assessment, 2002, 10: 387 - 400
  • 8Buchanan T, Smith J L. Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 1999, 90:125 - 144
  • 9Gati I, Saka N. Internet - based versus paper - and - pencil assessment: Measuring career decision - making difficulties. Journal of Career Assessment, 2001,9:379 -416
  • 10Pasveer K A, Ellard J H. The making of a personality inventory: Help from the WWW. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1998, 30, 309 - 313

共引文献36

同被引文献350

引证文献4

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部