摘要
行政公益诉讼作为新入法律规定的内容,行政公益诉讼适格被告与《行政诉讼法》规定的行政诉讼内容存在衔接问题。现行法律规定的被告及最高检公布的指导案例均为行政机关直接行政行为,对于间接行政行为适格被告缺乏法律明文规定,检察机关启动行政公益诉讼受阻。以乡镇土地开发事宜委托其他组织代管产生的国有资产流失问题作为切入点,以确定行政公益诉讼适格被告为目的,引入行政委托、隐名代理、法人人格否认等理论,结合法律解释方法和立法技术知识,以明确间接行政行为行政公益诉讼被告的认定路径。
Administrative public interest litigation is the new content of the law,so that there are problems between the appropriate defendant for administrative public interest litigation and the administrative litigation content stipulated in the Administrative Litigation Law.The defendant under the current law and the guiding cases announced by the Supreme People’s Procuratorate are all direct administrative acts of the administrative organs.For the indirect administrative act,lacks the law and the explicit provisions for the appropriate defendant,so the procuratorial organs cannot initiate the administrative public interest litigation.Take the issue of the loss of state-owned assets entrusted by other organizations in the development of township land as an entry point to determine the appropriate defendant for administrative public interest litigation,introducing the theory of administrative entrustment,anonymous agency and legal personality denial,combined with legal interpretation methods and legislative technical knowledge,to study the path to identify the defendant of administrative public interest litigation in the indirect administrative acts.
作者
宋伟锋
Song Weifeng(Kramai City People’s Procuratorate,Karamay Xinjiang 834000,China)
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2018年第6期68-77,共10页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词
行政诉讼被告
行政公益诉讼适格被告
行政委托
法人人格否认
defendant in administrative litigation
appropriate defendant for administrative public interest litigation
administrative entrustment
legal personality denial