网约私家车APP出行平台事故责任认定研讨

Discussion on the responsibility confirmation of car accidents at online car hiring platform

2016年国家明确了网约车运营的合法身份,政府管制让网约车平台的身份和规范得到一定的明晰,但网约车平台运营在共享机遇下迎来更大发展空间同时,涉及网约车的交通事故纠纷日益涌现。网约私家车模式中以雇佣关系认定的快车和以居间关系认定的顺风车在交通事故中对出行平台的事故责任要求不同,在新的经济环境下对现有利益相关者的妥善保护是预防交通事故责任纠纷的重要部分,侵权法草案(室内稿)第46条关于平台责任的规定缺乏对出行平台项下各种机动车种类的必要区分,由此造成责任认定不明。通过私家车与非私家车的划分重构第46条平台责任问题方可实现在法益保护与行为自由的紧张关系中保持微妙的平衡。

In 2016,the legal status of the network vehicle operation was clearly confirmed at the level of the state ministries and commissions.Amid a shared economic climate,the online car hiring platform,a symbol of optimal resources allocation,had a huge impact on the traditional taxi industry.The traffic accident disputes revolving around online-hired car are becoming even more serious when the operation of the online hiring car network expects more growth in the sharing opportunity.In the private car model,the"express car"identified by the employment relationship and the"get a ride"determined by the interposition relationship are different in the accident liability confirmation for the trip platform in the traffic accident In a new economic climate,the proper protection of the existing stakeholders is an important part of the prevention of traffic accident liability disputes.The forty-sixth article of the draft tort law(indoor draft)lacks the necessary distinction between the various types of motor vehicles on the online travel platform,resulting in the unidentified responsibility.Through the division of private cars and non-private cars,the forty-sixth platform responsibility problem can be reconstructed to achieve a delicate balance between the protection of legal interests and the tension of freedom of conduct.