期刊文献+

从“闹婚”到“婚闹”的刑法学省思

Reflections Learn from “Wedding Customs” to “Wedding Trouble” in Criminal Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “闹婚”本是传统习俗之一,随着社会的发展却脱逸出原有的民俗文化场域,致使游走于违法和犯罪之间的事件频频发生。无论是失范行为还是犯罪行为都已经具备了类型化的样态,但实践中由于司法惰性及民俗盲目认可等原因,却并未受到应有规制,从而造成了“婚闹”的归责缺位与继发性失控。刑法学视角下,失范行为和犯罪行为可以做出合理的界限划分,对严重超出社会相当性的“婚闹”行为予以刑事归责,对于游走违法和犯罪的失范行为以积极治安处罚,反而能够产生习俗正向的引导作用。在厘清行为性质的前提下,对躲在民俗外衣下的实质犯罪行为积极追诉,更能维护被害人的合法权益,保护社会善良的性道德观念,剔除社会中不合理的价值导向。 “Wedding customs” is one of the traditional customs of our country. With the development of society, it has escaped from the original folk culture field, and the incidents of illegal activities and crimes have occurred frequently. Whether it is anomie or criminal behavior, it has already been typed, but in practice, due to judicial inertia and blind recognition of folklore, it has not been subject to due regulation, resulting in the lack of attribution of “marriage”. With secondary out of control. From the perspective of criminal law, anomie behaviors and criminal behaviors can be divided into reasonable boundaries, criminally blaming the “marriage” behavior that is serious beyond the social equivalent, and actively punishing the illegal behaviors of illegal activities and crimes. Can produce a positive guiding role. Under the premise of clarifying the nature of the behavior, the company actively pursues the substantive crimes under the cloak of folklore, safeguards the legitimate rights and interests of the victims, protects the socially ethical moral values, and eliminates the unreasonable value orientation in society.
作者 张学文 Zhang Xuewen(School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处 《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》 2018年第6期125-133,共9页 Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
基金 2018年西南政法大学科研创新项目:“婚闹”过界行为的定性分析——以强制侮辱猥亵为例(项目编号:FXY20180038)
关键词 习俗 “婚闹”失范 刑事政策 追诉懈怠 Custom Marital Disorder Criminal Policy Negligence in Prosecution
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部