期刊文献+

主观判断评分和图像测量分析法用于下睑皱纹评估的对比研究 被引量:1

A Comparative Study of Subjective Judgment Score and Image Measurement in the Evaluation of Lower Eyelid Wrinkles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨主观判断评分和图像测量分析法用于下睑皱纹评估应用价值的对比研究。方法:对57例受试自愿者用主观判断评分和图像测量分析法对其下睑皱纹进行分析比较,探讨主观判断评分和图像测量分析法的参数与年龄之间的相关性,把图像测量分析法得到的参数进行分类,进一步探讨各指标和年龄及主观判断评分的相关性。结果:3名评估人员的平均Kappa评分也皆大于0.6分,Kappa评分与年龄有显著相关性(r=0.903,P<0.05);除SER、SESC之外的其他图像测量分析法参数都与年龄及主观判断评分有显著相关性(P<0.05);NRJ随年龄及主观评分的增大而减小(P<0.05);其他参数随年龄及主观评分的增大而增加(P<0.05)。单因素方差分析结果显示,5个等级NRJ、ENT、CONT、HOM和VAR参数比较,差异具有统计学意义(F=-215.926、15.185、43.107、62.560、27.799,P<0.05);NRJ、ENT和CONT参数随着主观判断评分等级升高而降低,HOM和VAR参数随着主观判断评分等级升高而增加;单因素方差分析结果显示,5个等级SESM、SEW、R_1、R_2、R_3和R_4比较,差异具有统计学意义(F=49.237、34.307、46.822、30.095、50.894、33.607,P<0.05);粗糙程度及粗糙度参数均随着主观判断评分等级升高而增加。结论:主观判断评分和图像测量分析法对下睑皱纹评估的效果都比较明显,这两种方法得到的各指标之间均具有显著相关性。 Objective To study the value of subjective judgment score and image measurement in the evaluation of lower eyelid wrinkles.Methods The lower eyelid wrinkles of 57 volunteers were analyzed and compared by subjective judgment score and image measurement analysis,and the correlation between the parameters of subjective judgment score and image measurement analysis was discussed.The parameters obtained by image measurement analysis are classified,and the correlation between each index,age and subjective judgment score is further discussed.Results The average Kappa score of the three evaluators was also greater than 0.6.There was a significant correlation between the Kappa score and age(r=0.903,P<0.05).The parameters of image measurement analysis except SER,SESC have significant correlation with age and subjective judgment score(P<0.05).NRJ decreases with age and subjective score(P<0.05).Other parameters increase with age and subjective score(P<0.05).The results of single factor variance analysis showed that the differences between the five grades of NRJ,ENT,CONT,HOM and VAR parameters were statistically significant(F=-215.926,15.185,43.107,62.560,27.799,P<0.05).The parameters of NRJ,ENT and CONT decreased with the increase of subjective judgment rating,and the parameters of VAR and HOM increased with the increase of subjective judgment grade,and the results of single factor variance analysis showed that the differences between the five grades of SESM,SEW,R1,R2,R3 and R4 were statistically significant(F=49.237,34.307,46.822,30.095,50.894,33.607,P<0.05).The roughness degree and roughness parameter increased with the increase of subjective judgment grade.Conclusion The subjective judgment score and the image measurement method were effective in the evaluation of lower eyelid wrinkles,and there was a significant correlation between the indexes obtained by the two methods.
作者 吴丹丹 常文秀 蔡昊 左莉莉 刘聪 WU Dan-dan;CHANG Wen-xiu;CAI Hao;ZUO Li-li;LIU Cong(Occupational Health Checkup Department,Harrison International Heping Hospital,Hengshui 053000,Hebei,China;Department of Nephrology,Nankai Affiliated Hospital(Tianjin First Central Hospital),Tianjin 300000,China;Department of Cardiology,the First People's Hospital of Tianjin,Tianjin 300000,China)
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2019年第1期42-45,共4页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 主观判断评分 图像测量分析法 下睑皱纹 应用价值 相关性 subjective judgment score image measurement analysis lower eyelid wrinkles application value correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

  • 1李利,唐莉,S.MacMary,P.Humbert.皮肤纹理量化评价及在医学美容中的应用[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2005,11(1):53-55. 被引量:6
  • 2NIELSEN P K, ZHAO L, STAMNES J J, et of human skin:Aspects important for human Norway: The Norwegian academy of science 2008 al. The optics health [R]. and letters,.
  • 3KRISHNASWAMY A, BARANOSKI V G G [R]. Canada: A study on skin optics, 2004.
  • 4GUAJAR S R, BACKMAN V, PERELMAN T L. et al. Image Human epithelial properties with polarized light- scattering spectroscopy [J]. Nature medicine, 2001, 7(11): 1246-1248.
  • 5MATSUBARA A. Differences in the surface and subsurface reflection characteristics of facial skin by age group [J]. Skin Research and Technology, 2012, 18(1): 29-35.
  • 6SAUERMANN G, EBENS B, HOPPE U. Analysis of facial comedos by porphyrin fluorescence and image analysis [J]. Journal of Toxicology, 1990, 9(2): 369-385.
  • 7QUD,BYLSMABR,MAYNETJ,eta1.图像法定量分析皮肤颜色和化妆品功效评价[c]//中国香料香精化妆品工业协令第九届中国化妆品学术研讨会论文集,2012.
  • 8DEMIRLI R, OTTO P, VISWANATHAN R, et al. RBXTM technology overview [R]. 2007.
  • 9PUCCETTI G, FARES H. A new approach for evaluating the water resistance of sunscreens on consumers: tap water vs. Salt water vs. Chlorine water [J]. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2014, 36:284-290.
  • 10黄珊珊,李利.人表皮厚度与皮肤衰老[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2011,17(1):34-36. 被引量:5

共引文献77

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部