期刊文献+

再次妊娠孕妇剖宫产术后阴道试产的可行性及安全性分析 被引量:11

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨再次妊娠孕妇剖宫产术后阴道试产(TOLAC)的可行性及安全性。方法选择2017年4月至2018年4月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院住院且符合TOLAC指征的产妇180例。TOLAC试产成功138例纳为A组,试产失败后转剖宫产42例纳为B组。随机选取同期初产妇180例为对照,其中试产成功152例为C组,试产失败后转剖宫产28例为D组。分别比较A组与C组、A组与B组中产妇一般情况及母婴结局,分析经产妇、初产妇试产失败主要影响因素及术后并发症。结果 A组产妇产后出血发生率高于C组,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05); B组产妇的住院天数高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05); A组与C组、A组与B组的一般情况及母婴结局比较,差异无统计学差异(P> 0. 05)。B组22例产妇因社会因素而中转剖宫产,而D组8例中转剖宫产,两组差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。B组因其他产科因素导致的试产失败10例,少于D组(15例),两组差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论在严格的操作规程及密切监测系统下,TOLAC是安全可行的。
出处 《安徽医学》 2018年第12期1490-1492,共3页 Anhui Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献63

  • 1Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth AfterPrevious Caesarean Birth. Green-top Guideline No.45[EB/OL]. (2015-10-01) [2016-05-10]. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45/.
  • 2National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Caesarean section. NICE clinical guideline 132[M].Manchester: NICE, 2011.
  • 3Sentilhes L, Vayssi^re C, Beucher G, et al. Delivery forwomen with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinicalpractice from the French College of Gynecologists andObstetricians (CNGOF)[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Heprod Biol,2013,170(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015.
  • 4Guise JM, Hashima J, Osterweil P. Evidence-based vaginalbirth after Caesarean section[J]. Best Pract Res Clin ObstetGynaecol, 2005,19(1):117-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015.
  • 5American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOGPractice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previouscesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(2 Pt 1):450-456. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251.
  • 6Clark SM, Carver AH, Hankins GD. Vaginal birth aftercesarean and trial of labor after cesarean: what should we berecommending relative to maternal risk:benefit?[J]. WomensHealth (Lond), 2012,8(4):371-383. DOI: 10.2217/whe.l2.28.
  • 7Whitelaw N, Bhattacharya S, McLernon D, et al. Internetinformation on birth options after caesarean compared to theRCOG patient information leaflet; a web survey [J]. BMCPregnancy Childbirth, 2014,14:361. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-361.
  • 8Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Risk of uterine rupture associated withan interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months[J]. ObstetGynecol,2010,115(5):1003-1006. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.ObOBe-3181d992fb.
  • 9Dekker GA, Chan A,Luke CG, et al. Risk of uterine rupturein Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one priorcaesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohortstudy[J]. BJOG, 2010,117(11):1358-1365. DOI: 10.1111/j.l471-0528.2010.02688.x.
  • 10Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMUCesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial oflabor after previous cesarean deli very [J]. Am J ObstetetGynecol, 2005, 193(3 pt 2):1016-1023. '.

共引文献376

同被引文献105

引证文献11

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部