人类命运共同体构建与全球“元”治理范式

Construction of a Community with Shared Future for Mankind and a Paradigm for Global Meta-governance

西方基于不同理论框架和体系的全球治理研究,除了针对如何解决全球性问题的经验社会科学研究路径即工具主义路径外,还有一条指向全球化的未来构想和构型的反思性研究路径,即建构主义路径。通过与全球化的历史、现实、发展和前景密切联系起来,全球治理的视阈在与"国际社会"、"国家社会"、"世界政府"、"世界共同体"(或"全球共同体")、"全球民间社会"等概念的界定、探讨和阐发中不断得以扩展。同时,由于治理本身所蕴涵的基本逻辑,如治理模式、治理类型、治理结构和元治理等,在欧盟的建制和实践的启发下,发展出一些新的概念,如多层次(元)治理、多尺度(元)治理和多空间(元)治理等,全球治理的建构主义研究路径凸显出更为重要的意义。关于人类命运共同体的研究,不能仅仅把它作为全球治理的中国方案,可能更为重要的是把它当做全球化的一种理想构型。循此思路,需要论证的就是,人类命运共同体怎样作为超越西方的"世界共同体"或"全球共同体"和"全球民间社会"这些概念的一种未来世界构型,并且怎样作为全球化时代的全球治理的"元"治理范式。

Western global governance studies based on various theoretical frameworks and systems have two approaches,one is empirical social science approach focused on tackling global problems,i.e. instrumental approach,another is reflective approach directed to the imagination and configuration for the future of globalization,i.e. constructive approach. By relating to the history,reality, development and perspective of globalization,the horizons of global governance are widened in terms of the definition,exploration and interpretation for concepts such as 'international society','society of states','world government','world community'(or 'global community'),and 'global civil society'. The basic logics of governance,such as governance model,governance style,governance structure,and meta-governance,evolve into some new concepts,such as multi-level(meta-)governance,multi-scalar(meta-)governance,and multi-spatial (meta-)governance,in the light of constitution and practice of European Union. So constructive approach makes more important significance. The studies on a community with shared future for mankind,should not be only regarded as Chinese project,but it is more important to regard it as the ideal configuration of globalization. What need to be done is to argue,how it is possible for a community with shared future for mankind to be the configuration of world future by transcending 'world community'(or 'global community'),and 'global civil society',and how is it possible to be a paradigm for global meta-governance.