期刊文献+

滑溜水减阻剂实验室评价及现场应用 被引量:4

Laboratory Evaluation and Field Application of Friction Reducer in Slick Water
下载PDF
导出
摘要 减阻剂实验室评价常用指标主要有减阻能力评价、配伍性评价及地层伤害评价等。其中,减阻能力是评价滑溜水最为重要的技术指标,准确估算压裂摩阻,对施工排量的设计十分关键;配伍性评价,通常首先采用环路摩阻测试评价不同基液下的减阻能力,然后使用流变仪对添加不同添加剂的滑溜水流变性能进行测试;地层伤害一般通过测定伤害前后渗透率的变化来确定。目前典型的现场应用有4种情况,不同的施工环境、施工要求对减阻剂的要求均不同。 The indicators commonly used in laboratory to evaluate friction reducers include drag reduction capability,compatibility,and formation damage. Among them,the drag reduction capability is the most vital technical index for evaluating slick water. Accurate estimation of fracturing friction is critical to the design of construction displacement. As for compatibility,the loop friction test is firstly used to evaluate friction reduction of different base fluids,and then the rheometer is used to test the rheological properties of slick water with different additives. Formation damage is generally determined by measuring the change in permeability before and after the experiment. At present,there are 4 typical field applications,and different construction environment requires different friction reducers.
作者 张乐 周福建 汪杰 梁天博 ZHANG Le;ZHOU Fujian;WANG Jie;LIANG Tianbo(Unconventional Natural Gas Institute,China University of Petroleum(Beijing),Beijing 102200,China)
出处 《重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2018年第6期62-66,共5页 Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology:Natural Sciences Edition
基金 国家科技重大专项"碳酸盐岩储层难动用储量高效改造关键技术研究"(2016ZX05030005-002)
关键词 滑溜水 减阻剂 实验室评价 减阻能力 slick water friction reducer laboratory evaluation drag reduction capability
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1CURTIS J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.
  • 2Hill D G,Nel son C R.Reservoir properties of the Upper Creta-ceous Lewis Shale,a new natural gas play in the San J uan Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2000,84(8):1240.
  • 3Milici R C.Autogenic gas(self sourced) from shale:an example from the Appalachian basin[J].Howell D G.The Future of Energy Gases,US Geological Survey Professional Paper.Washington:US Geological Survey,1993,1570:253-278.
  • 4Palisch T T,Vincent M C,Handrert P J.ring "C food for thought[C]// SPE Annual Technical Confer-ence and Exhibition,Denver,Colorado,USA: SPE , 2008.
  • 5Omkar Jaripatke, Bill Grieser, KK Chong. A completions roacmap to shale play development " C a review of successful ap-proach towards shale play stimulation in the last two decades[C]// SPE Deep Gas Conference and Exhibition,Manama,Bahrain: SPE,2010.
  • 6Reynolds M M. . Development update for an emerging shale gasgiant Field-horn river basin, british Columbia, canada[C]/./ SPEUnconventional Gas Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,USA: SPE,2010.
  • 7Nathan Houston. Fracture-stimulation in the marcellus shalel lessons learned in fluid selection and execution [C]// SPE East-ern Regional Meeting,Charleston, West Virginia, USA: SPE ,2009.
  • 8Charles Boyer, John Kieschnick, Roberto Suarez-Rivera,RichardE. Lewis.页岩气藏的开采[J].油田新技术,2006 :27-30.
  • 9Daniel Arthur J,Brian Bohm,Mark Layne. Considerations fordevelopment of marcellus shale gas[J]. World Oil, 2009(6) : 65-66.
  • 10Mark parker, bily slabaugh. Gas study: optimizing hydraulicfracturing performance in northeastern united states fracturedshale formations[C]// SPE Production and Operations Sym-posiium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma,USA: SPE,2003.

共引文献83

同被引文献42

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部