期刊文献+

图书馆移动阅读资源建设与服务中的著作权侵权控制研究 被引量:11

Research on Copyright Infringement Control in the Construction and Offering of Mobile Resources in Libraries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在移动阅读资源建设与服务中,图书馆将馆藏作品数字化向馆舍以外注册读者提供、制作和传播书目数据与摘要、移动阅读平台供第三方传播阅读资源、传播读者的作品阅读评论等行为都存在著作权侵权的风险。设置和适用专门的法定许可条款,图书馆数字化馆藏作品向馆舍外注册读者提供方能获得著作权法的支持;获得著作权人许可、合理使用著作权作品,图书馆可以有效规避编制与传播书目数据和摘要著作权侵权行为发生;争取适当的免责条件,图书馆可以享有移动阅读平台上因第三方传播侵权资源和图书馆传播读者侵权评论侵权责任的豁免权。 In the construction and offering of mobile resources,there could be risks of copyright infringement for libraries,not only in the offering of digital collections,bibliographic data and abstracts,and third-party mobile resources for registered readers outside library buildings,but also in the spreading of readers'commentaries.Libraries should take the following measures to avoid such risks.First,as for providing digital collections for registered readers outside library buildings,libraries should enact and apply special statutory licensing provisions,so as to obtain the support of copyright law.Second,as for the compilation and spreading of bibliographic data and abstracts,libraries should obtain the permission of copyright holders and make an appropriate use of their work.Third,as for the offering of third-party resources on third-party mobile platforms and the spreading of readers'commentaries,libraries should make full use of the exemption conditions,so as to be free from being accused of copyright infringement.
作者 吉宇宽 JI Yukuan
出处 《图书馆论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第2期86-93,共8页 Library Tribune
基金 国家社科基金项目"‘互联网+’背景下的数字图书馆著作权利益保障研究"(项目编号:16BTQ009)研究成果
关键词 图书馆 全民阅读服务 著作权侵权 控制策略 library national reading service copyright infringement control strategy
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献6

  • 1Robert P.Merges. Contracting into Liability Rules:Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations[J].California Law Review,1996.1293.doi:10.2307/3480996.
  • 2Edward Samuels. The Illustrated Story of Copyright[M].New York:St.Martin's Press,2000.37-39.
  • 3David M.Israelite. Testimony before The Subcommittee on Courts,The Internet,and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives[M].U.S.House of Representatives,2006.
  • 4Stuart M.Maxey. That CARP is No Keeper:Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels-Change is Needed,Here is Why and How[J].J Intell Prop L,2003,(10).
  • 5熊琦.著作权集中许可机制的正当性与立法完善[J].法学,2011(8):101-110. 被引量:26
  • 6熊琦.著作权法定许可的正当性解构与制度替代[J].知识产权,2011,21(6):38-43. 被引量:58

引证文献11

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部