期刊文献+

人类增强可以作为道德义务吗?——约翰·哈里斯“人类增强进化论”解析 被引量:6

Can Human Enhancements Serve as Moral Duties?——An Analysis on John Harris' Theory of“Enhancing Evolution”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 约翰·哈里斯的"人类增强进化论"强调人类增强能够使人成为更加完善的人,增强在人类进化当中也起到重要作用。当代高新技术条件下的人类增强技术以一种对人的身体直接编辑、制定的方式大大缩短了人类的进化进程,以"刻意选择"代替"自然选择"、以"增强进化论"代替"达尔文进化论"。哈里斯进而认为人类增强能够作为绝对的善或积极的道德义务。哈里斯的批评者们则认为哈里斯对增强的定义过于宽泛,也没有明确界定"义务"的概念,因而否认人类增强是一种绝对的善或积极的道德义务的观点,认为人类增强至多是一项"显见义务"。人类增强的伦理学呼吁一种负责任的人类增强事业,只有作为一项负责任"事业"的人类增强才是我们应当去推进并接纳的道德义务。 John Harris theory of“Enhancing Evolution”underlines that human enhancements not only make better people,but also play a profound role in human evolution.Contemporary human enhancements under advanced technologies can directly edit and engineer human bodies,which greatly shorten the process of human evolution,and replace“natural selection”with“deliberate selection”and Darwinian evolution with“enhancement evolution”.Thus,human enhancements can be seen as“absolute good”or“positive moral duty”.However,Harris critics think that Harris definition of“enhancement”is too wide to figure out and“duty”is not clearly defined as well.Accordingly,they deny Harris arguments and state that enhancements are no more than“prima facie duties”.Finally,the ethics of human enhancements calls for a responsible enterprise,i.e.,only human enhancements as a responsible“enterprise”can be recognized as a moral duty which we should both develop and adopt.
作者 刘铮 LIU Zheng(Department of Philosophy,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China;Department of Philosophy,University of Bergen,Bergen 5020,Norway)
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期8-13,共6页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(15BZX037) 国家留学基金委员会和挪威研究理事会"挪威互换奖学金"共同资助项目(201702720007)
关键词 约翰·哈里斯 人类增强 道德义务 进化论 基因编辑 John Harris human enhancement moral duty evolution gene editing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献71

  • 1达尔文.人类的由来[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983..
  • 2Daniels, N.. Growth Hormone Therapy for Short Stature: Can We Support the Treatment/Enhancement Distinction? [J]. Growth: Genet- ics & Hormones, 1992, 8(Suppl. 1): 46-48.
  • 3Juengst, E.. Can Enhance-Ment Be Distinguished from Prevention in Genetic Medicine? [J]. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1997, 22: 125-142.
  • 4Juengst, E.. What does Enhancement Mean?, In: Parens, E.. (ed.), Enhancing Humwt Traits: Ethical and Social Implications [M]. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 1998, 29-47.
  • 5Lin, P., AUhoff, F.. Untangling the Debate: The Ethics of Human Enhancement [J]. Nanoeth/cs, 2008, 2: 251-264.
  • 6IChadwick, R.. Therapy, Enhancement and Improvement, In: Gordijn, B. & Chadwick R. (eds), Enhancement and Posthumanity[M]. Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 2008, 107-136.
  • 7Hansson, 5. O.. Implant Ethics LJJ. J Med ,2005, 31: 519-52_.5.
  • 8Savulescu, J.. Justice, Fairness, and Enhancement [ J ] . Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2006, 1093: 321-338.
  • 9Waiters, L.. The Ethics of Human C, ene Therapy[J]. Nature, 1990, 320: 225-227.
  • 10Parens, E.. Is Better Always Good? The Enhancement Project[J]. The Hastirigs Center Report, 1998, 1 : S1-S17.

共引文献22

同被引文献67

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部