期刊文献+

论查尔斯·蒂利民主理论及其对“西方民主普世论”的消解

下载PDF
导出
摘要 查尔斯·蒂利的民主理论在核心概念、理论框架、研究方法、论证逻辑及最终结论等方面都与传统民主化理论有着较大的差别,对传统民主化理论进行了创新和补充。过程取向的民主定义是该理论的内核;"政体"、"抗争"和"民主"两两结合的三组互动关系构成该理论的框架;将信任网络融入公共政治、种类不平等与公共政治相隔离、自治权力中心的消除等三大民主化过程是该理论的重要构件。该理论有效地消解了"西方民主普世论"的影响,但也有着机械性、简单化和缺少价值关照等局限性。
作者 王翰
出处 《湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版)》 2018年第12期22-25,共4页 Journal of Hubei University of Economics(Humanities and Social Sciences)
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献44

  • 1Thomas Carothers, "The End of the Transition Paradigm", JournalofDemocracy, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2002, pp. 5-21.
  • 2David Collier and Steven Levitsky, "Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research", World Politics, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2002, pp. 430-451.
  • 3[美]亨廷顿.《第三波-20世纪后期的民主化浪潮》,刘军宁译,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.
  • 4Daniel Levine, Paradigm Lost: From Dependency to Democracy, World Politics , Vol. 40, No. 2, 1988, p. 378.
  • 5Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, Political Crafting and Democratic Consolidation or Destruction: European and South American Comparisons, in Robert A. Pastor, ed. , Democracy in Americas: Stopping the Pendulum, New York: Holmes and Meier, 1989, p. 41.
  • 6Doh Chull Shin, On the Third Wave of Democratization: a Synthesis and Evaluation of Recent Theory and Research, Worm Politics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 1994, pp. 138-161.
  • 7Dankwart A. Rostow, Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model, Comparative Politics, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1970, pp. 350-360.
  • 8Guillermo A. O' Donnell and Philippe C. Schmitter, Transition from Authoritarian Rule : Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 3-5.
  • 9倪炎元.《东亚威权政权之转型》,第19-20页,台北,月旦出版社股份有限公司,1995.
  • 10Terry Lynn Carl and Philippe C. Schmitter, Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe, International Social Science Journal, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1991, pp. 269-254, p. 270.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部