期刊文献+

期货内幕交易处罚中“违法所得”的认定——以光大案为例

The Determination of “Illegal Gains” in the Punishment of Futures Insider Trading
下载PDF
导出
摘要 光大证券是目前我国证监会作出的唯一一个涉及期货市场内幕交易的行政处罚对象。其作为期货市场的套期保值者,做空股指期货的行为不构成对内幕信息的利用。即使按照证监会的认定,光大证券做空股指期货的行为构成内幕交易,也不应以盯市盈利的方法计算光大违法所得。根据《企业会计准则》的规定,应以光大证券实际盈利作为其违法所得,由此引发对期货内幕交易处罚中"违法所得"计算的认定,以及《期货交易管理条例》中内幕交易分段罚款合理性的质疑。 Up to now Everbright Securities is the only object of administrative punishment issued by China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) involving insider trading in futures market. As a hedge in futures market, shorting stock index futures of Everbright Securities does not constitute the use of insider information. In addition, according to CSRC's determination criteria, even if insider trading activity was proved to be true, it is not appropriate for CSRC to apply Mark-to-market |Accounting Rule to calculate the illegal gains of Everbright Securities. Instead, CSRC shall take the actual profits of Everybright Securities as the illegal gains in accordance with Accounting Standards for Enterprises. By analyzing the case of Everbright Securities, this article questions whether the punishment from Administrative Regulations on Futures Trading is rational in determining “illegal gains” in the punishment of futures insider trading.
作者 钟明霞 傅筱帆 Zhong Mingxia;Fu Xiaofan
机构地区 深圳大学法学院
出处 《法治社会》 2019年第1期79-86,共8页 Law-Based Society
关键词 光大证券事件 期货市场 内幕交易 违法所得 Everbright Securities Case Futures Market Insider Trading Illegal Gains
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献85

  • 1许传玺.中国侵权法现状:考察与评论[J].政法论坛,2002,20(1):34-49. 被引量:35
  • 2财政部注册会计师考试委员会办公室.《会计》,中国财政经济出版社2008年版.
  • 3In re Sterling Drug, Inc.,[1978 Transfer Binder] Fed. Sec. L. Rep.[M] CCH, Apr.18,1987:80-295.
  • 4Donald C. Langevoort, Insider Trading: Regulation, Entbrcement and Prevention 3.04[M] West Group,1994;3-23.
  • 5Phyllis Diamond, Mclucas Hails O' Hagan Ruling, But says Issues over reach of theory Remain, 29 Sec. reg. &.L. Rep., 1997:1097- 1098.
  • 6David W Jolly,Knowing PossessiQn vs. Actual Use : Due Process and Social Costs in Civil Insider Trading Actions[J]. George Mason Law Review, 1999(8):233-254.
  • 7Corporations and Markets Advisory Committe.e (Australia), "Insider Trading Report (Nov. 2003)" :sec.3.8.2.
  • 8Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (Australia), '!Insider Trading Report (Nov. 2003)" :sec.3.8.
  • 9Govermnent response to Report of the House of Representative Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, "Fair share for All: Insider Trading in Australia" (11 Oct. 1990).
  • 10“叶环保国有公司人员失职、滥用职权、内幕交易,顾健内幕交易案”,载http://china.findlaw.cn/xingf3/nyzqzal/20070210/6990_5.html/2010-07-08.

共引文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部