期刊文献+

WTO改革应关注发展中成员的能力缺失问题 被引量:39

WTO Reform and Capacity Constraint of Its Developing Members
原文传递
导出
摘要 发展议题是多边贸易谈判的组成部分,也是当前世贸组织(WTO)改革的讨论内容。发展中国家特殊与差别待遇是多边发展议题的核心构成,历史沿革为给惠与受惠的关系。通过将"不完全契约"、"能力贫困"等理论分析框架引入多边贸易谈判领域,本文认为,发展议题的本质是发展中国家存在能力缺失,而能力缺失问题制约了发展中国家的谈判水平以及将谈判成果转化为国内经济发展的程度。从能力缺失和一系列经济社会指标看,中国仍是发展中国家。多边发展议题的出路在于弥补"规则赤字",解决发展中国家的能力缺失问题,既起始于多边规则谈判,也落脚于多边规则实施,即通过多边规则转化为国内法律法规,并将这一能力转化为国内经济和社会发展的动力和内生变量,进而发展中国家才能自主在多边贸易谈判中"根据能力作贡献"。 The issue of development has been an integral part of the multilateral trade negotiations and also an important aspect of the current WTO reform discussions. The special and differential treatment (S&DT) for developing countries is at the core of the development issue, which deals with the relationship between preference-giving and preference-taking. By introducing some theoretical analysis frameworks, such as the theory of“incomplete contract”and“poverty as capability deprivation”into the multilateral trade negotiations, this article concludes that the essence of the development issue at WTO is the capacity constraint of developing countries: the insufficient capacity limits the extent of their capability to negotiate internationally and transform the negotiated outcomes into domestic economic development. Reviewing the capacity constraint and an array of economic and social indicators, it argues that China is still a developing country. It also argues that the“deficit of rules”should be properly tackled to promote multilateral trade negotiations on development. The capacity constraint of developing countries stems from the past negotiations of multilateral trade rules and is demonstrated in the implementation of those rules. As a result, the developing countries may, on a voluntary basis, make contributions that match their capacities to multilateral trade negotiations through transforming multilateral trade rules into domestic laws and regulations and further converting their capacity into a driving force and endogenous engine for their domestic economic and social development.
作者 张向晨 徐清军 王金永 Zhang Xiangchen;Xu Qingjun;Wang Jinyong
出处 《国际经济评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第1期9-33,178,共26页 International Economic Review
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献78

  • 1周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007,42(7):36-50. 被引量:5681
  • 2[美]E·博登海默.《法理学-法律哲学与法律方法》,邓正来译,中国政法大学出版社.2004年版,第563页以下.
  • 3黄亚生,《改革时期的外国直接投资》,钱勇、王润亮译.北京:新星出版社,2005年.
  • 4英国知识产权委员会.《知识产权与发展政策的整合》(导论部分),国家知识产权局条法司编译,国家知识产权局条法司2000年印行.
  • 5[美]苏姗.K.塞尔.《私权,公法--知识产权的全球化》,董刚等译,中国人民大学出版社2008年版,第75-117页.
  • 6See Peter Drahos, "Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard-setting", 5 The Journal of World Intellectual Prop- erty (2002), pp. 770 - 776,.
  • 7See "Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge Holders", WIPO Report on Fact-Finding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge (1998- 1999), WIPO, Geneva, April 2001, p.25.
  • 8英国知识产权委员会.《知识产权与发展政策相结合》,伦敦2002年9月,第5页.
  • 9http.//www.ipreormnission, org/graphic/Chinese-Intro, htm, 2011 年12月26日访问.
  • 10Laurence R. Helfer, "Regime Shifting. the TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking", 29 The Yale Journal of International law (2004), p.14.

共引文献132

同被引文献460

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部