网络表达追责的法治理性研究

On ruling expressions on the Internet by legal rationality

网络表达追责存在法条适用形式化、刑事政策偏重倾向:一是"社会秩序""社会危害"认定的模糊性,表现为"社会危害性"解释的主观性,缺失"危害社会秩序"是否适合诽谤罪、"社会危害性"认定是否宜于采取优势证据标准的考量;二是以"寻衅滋事"追责须强化法条的实质性解释,强调援引"寻衅滋事"适用对象的明确性及法益取舍的恰当性;三是应当严格诽谤入罪条件,即以民事责任优先政策弱化检举不实言论的诽谤罪适用。

Accountability for network expression tends to have a formalized application of legal terms and particular stress on criminal policies. Firstly,there exists fuzziness in recognizing "social order"and"social harmfulness",which can be found in the subjectivity of explaining"social harmfulness",the lack of whether "harmful to social order"is suitable for libel conviction,and the lack of whether "social harmfulness"can be determined based on priority evidences; Secondly,the accountability for "quarrel-provoking"needs to strengthen the substantive interpretation of legal terms,emphasizing the clarity of applicable objects and the appropriateness of the legal interests. Thirdly,the incrimination conditions of libel conviction need to be strict,that is to say,the priority policy of civil liability should be stressed by weakening the application of libel in the prosecution of false remarks.