期刊文献+

行业性劳动争议调解效率体系的法规范分析 被引量:2

An Analysis of the Legal Norm of the Industry Labor Dispute Mediation Efficiency System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行业性劳动争议调解的效率体系是影响其运用机会与效果的重要方面,其效率价值的关键又在于行业性劳动争议调解与司法确认、劳动仲裁审查的衔接。基于现行的规范体系,由于司法确认与仲裁审查两套机制的差异性表现以及司法确认中并行规则的安排,导致程序法理混乱、程序正当性不足、审查标准不一,进而在客观上减损了行业性劳动争议调解制度效率价值,这些问题与立法分散、程序价值定位不清晰密切相关。解决以上问题,应当将程序同质化作为解决问题的基本导向,改革立法分散且位阶低的现状,推动司法确认程序"二元化"格局向"一元化"转变,推动司法确认与劳动仲裁审查标准的一致性以及修正程序的价值追求。 The efficiency system of the industrial labor dispute mediation is an important aspect affecting its use of opportunities and effects.The key to the efficiency value lies in its convergence of industry labor dispute mediation with judicial confirmation and labor arbitration review.According to the existent normative system,problems such as procedural legal confusion,lack of legal justification,and differing review standards arise due to differences in the performance of the two sets of mechanisms for judicial confirmation and arbitration review.Thus,the arrangement of parallel rules in judicial confirmation detracts from the efficiency value of the industry-based labor dispute mediation system.These issues are closely related to the fragmentation of legislation and the unclear positioning of procedural values.To solve the above problems,homogenization of the procedures,as a result,should be introduced as the basic orientation of problem-solving,reforming the status quo of decentralized legislation and low levels of order,accelerating the transformation of the judicial confirmation process of"dualization"to a"universalization".Thus,the consistency of judicial confirmation and labor arbitration review standards and the revision process value can be achieved.
作者 夏旭丽 XIA Xuli(Songtian College,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 511370)
出处 《中国劳动关系学院学报》 2019年第1期46-55,共10页 Journal of China University of Labor Relations
基金 司法部2014年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目"劳动争议的行业处理机制研究"(项目编号:14SFB20032)的阶段性成果
关键词 行业性劳动争议调解 行业性专业性人民调解 司法确认 仲裁审查 Industry labor disputes mediation industry-specific professional people's mediation judicial confirmation arbitration review
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献55

共引文献67

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部