摘要
民众在对社会公平状况进行评价时会选择特定的对象进行比较,相应的比较对象可以分为反身公平和横向公平两个维度。社会公平比较对象的选择会受到主观和客观等因素的影响。基于问卷调查数据对民众社会公平比较对象选择影响因素的研究表明,在反身公平维度上,个人收入水平越高就越倾向于同自己过去的收入水平进行比较,受教育程度越高就越不倾向于同过去的收入水平进行比较,与西部地区民众相比,中部地区民众更愿意同自己过去的收入水平进行比较。在横向公平维度上,个人收入水平越高就越倾向于同自己条件相似的对象进行比较,受教育程度越高就越倾向于同自己条件相似的对象进行比较,城镇户籍人口比农村户籍人口更倾向于同自己条件相似的对象进行比较,国有部门工作人员更倾向于同自己条件相似的对象进行比较。相关研究发现有助于更好地理解社会公平认知状况。
When people evaluate social equity,they will choose specific referent.The referent can be divided into two dimensions:vertical fairness and horizontal fairness.The choice of referent will be influenced by subjective and objective factors.Based on the questionnaire data,the research on the influencing factors of referent selection shows that,on vertical fairness,the higher the level of personal income is,the more likely it is to compare with past income level;the higher the level of education is,the less likely it is to compare with past income level;compared with the people in the western region,the people in the central region are more willing to compare with past income level.On horizontal fairness,the higher the level of personal income is,the more inclined to compare with similar conditions;the higher the level of education is,the more inclined to compare with similar conditions;urban household registration population is more inclined to compare with similar conditions than rural household registration one;state-owned sector staff are more inclined to compare with those of the similar conditions.Relevant research findings contribute to a better understanding of the cognitive status of social fairness.
作者
杜平
麻宝斌
DU Ping;MA Bao-bin(School of Sociology and Political Science,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444;School of City Economics and Public Management,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China)
出处
《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期47-52,134,共7页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目"新时代人民对社会公平正义要求的实证研究"(18AZZ004)
上海市社科规划一般课题"国际消费城市建设视角下上海城市居民的文化消费研究"(2018BSH005)
关键词
社会公平
比较对象选择
反身公平
横向公平
影响因素
social fairness
referent selection
vertical fairness
horizontal fairness
influencing factors