期刊文献+

美国网络高等教育认证制度研究

American Online Higher Education Certification System and Its Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国网络高等教育在高等教育体系中占有举足轻重的地位,美国网络高等教育认证制度保障了美国网络高等教育的质量。信息技术飞速发展的今天,网络高等教育在我国仍处于发展阶段,网络教育质量相关的保障制度仍需完善。从比较研究的视角出发,对美国网络高等教育认证制度的发展背景、认证制度体系及其特点进行研究,分析得出美国网络高等教育认证制度具有"权力分配合理,制度实施灵活""机构层级鲜明,认证机构多元""认证机构专业,重视教育元评估"等特点,并得出对我国网络高等教育认证制度建设的启示,包括"增强质量意识,健全质量保证制度""鼓励多方参与,发展中介机构"和"细化认证标准,合理分配权重"。 American online higher education plays an important role in the higher education system.The American online higher education certification system guarantees the quality of American online higher education.Today,with the rapid development of information technology,online higher education is still in the development stage in China,and the guarantee system related to the quality of online education still needs to be improved.This research mainly studies the development background,certification system and characteristics of the network higher education certification system from the perspective of comparative research.It is concluded that the US network higher education certification system has“reasonable power distribution and flexible system implementation”.“Institutional level is distinct,the certification body is diversified”,“certification institution professional,attach importance to education meta-evaluation”and other characteristics,and draws enlightenment to the construction of China’s network higher education certification system,including“enhance quality awareness,improve quality assurance system”,“Encourage multiparty participation,develop intermediaries”and“refine the certification standards and assign weights reasonably”
作者 姚春霞 YAO Chun-xia(College of Education,Shenyang Normal University,Shenyang 110034,China)
出处 《职教通讯》 2018年第23期73-79,共7页 Communication of Vocational Education
关键词 网络高等教育 认证制度 教育质量 美国 online higher education certification system quality of education America
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1徐海,孙宁.美国远程教育的认证制度和质量保障及其对我国的启示[J].中国电化教育,2006(2):82-85. 被引量:6
  • 2王建成.中美高等教育认证制度比较分析[J].教育科学,2006,22(6):80-83. 被引量:6
  • 3杨红霞.鉴定与认可:美国高等教育认证制度探析[J].高等理科教育,2007(3):148-151. 被引量:3
  • 4I. Elain Alien and Jeff Seaman. 2010. Sloan Report: Learning on Demand, 2009 [ 7 ]. www. sloan -c. org/publications/survey/pdf.
  • 5I. Elain Allen and Jeff Seaman. 2006. Sloan Report : Making the Grade Online Education in the United States. www. sloan - c. org/ publications/survey/pdf.
  • 6CHEA. 2001. Annual Conference : The Many Dimensions of Quality Assurance. 22 January 2001, New Orleans, LA, USA. http://www. chea. org/events/O1 01 folder/janOl_preliminary, html.
  • 7Judith. S. Eaton. 2009. CHEA: An Overview of US Accreditation. http ://www. chea. org.
  • 8CHEA & USED. 2009. Recognized Accrediting Organizations. http ://www. chea. org.
  • 9Pond, W. K. 2002. Twenty - First Century Education and Training: Implications for Quality Assurance. The Intemet and Higher Educa-tion. 4, 185 - 192. http://www, qou. edu/homePage/arabic/re- searchProgram/eLeamingResearchs/twentyFirst, pdf.
  • 10USDE. 2006. Evidence of Quality in Distance Education Programs Drawn From Interviews with the Accreditation Community. http:// www. ysu. edufaccreditation/Resources/Accreditation - Evidence - of - Quality - in - DE - Programs. pdf.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部