期刊文献+

重症医学科病房病原菌分布与耐药性分析 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解该院重症医学科(ICU)病房分离的病原菌分布情况及对抗菌药物的耐药性分析,为指导临床合理用药提供参考依据。方法对2015―2017年ICU送检的4 328份感染性标本包括痰液、血液、尿液、分泌物、引流液等分离的致病菌进行鉴定及药敏试验。结果 4 328份送检标本检出病原菌751株,检出率17.4%,其中革兰阴性杆菌481株,占64.0%;革兰阳性球菌179株,占23.8%;真菌63株,占8.3%;其他病原菌28株,占3.9%。主要革兰阴性杆菌是肺炎克雷伯菌[129株(26.8%)]、大肠埃希菌[89株(18.5%)]、铜绿假单胞菌[60株(12.5%)]、嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌[64株(13.3%)]、鲍曼不动杆菌[53株(11.0%)]。主要革兰阳性球菌是金黄色葡萄球菌[69株(38.5%)]、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌[42株(23.5%)]、粪肠球菌[34株(19.6%)]。耐药性分析显示:革兰阴性杆菌(鲍曼不动杆菌除外)对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(TZP)、阿米卡星(AMK)高度敏感;革兰阴性杆菌(鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌除外)对亚胺培南(IMP)高度敏感。金黄色葡萄球菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌对万古霉素(VAN)、替加环素(TGC)、呋南妥因(FD)灵敏度达100%;粪肠球菌对万古霉素(VAN)、替加环素(TGC)、呋南妥因(FD)灵敏度达83%~100%。结论 ICU患者主要的感染途径是呼吸、血源性、泌尿系统,感染病原菌以革兰阴性菌为主,耐药率也相对较高,特别是鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌对碳青霉烯类抗菌药物的耐药性逐年增加。
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2019年第2期214-217,共4页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
基金 福建省青年科研课题(2017-1-99)
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献53

  • 1Doyle JS, Buising KL, Thursky KA,et al. Epidemiology of infections acquired in intensive care units [J]. Semin Respir Crit Care Med,2011,32(2):115-138.
  • 2Hanberger H, Walther S, Leone M, et al. Increased mortality associated with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in the intensive care unit: results from the EPIC II study[J]. Int J Antimierob Agents,2011,38(4) :331- 335.
  • 3GB/T1680-1996.职工工伤与职业病致残程度鉴定[S].[S].,..
  • 4Arias CA, Murray BE. Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century-a clinical super-challenge[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(5) : 439-443.
  • 5Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing[S]. Tweenty-first in- formational supplement, 2011, M100-S21 Vol 31 No. 1.
  • 6Falagas ME, Giannopoulou KP, Kokolakis GN, et al. Fosfo- mycin: use beyond urinary tract and gastrointestinal infec tions[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2008, 46(7): 1069-1077.
  • 7Olsson-Liljequist B, Burman LG. Introducing fosfomycin for surgical prophylaxis-emergence of resistance in aerobic faecal gram-negative bacteria of in patients, but not among strains causing infection after elective colorectal procedures [J ]. Scand J Infect Dis, 1993, 25(6) :725-733.
  • 8Andaker L, Burman LG, Eklund A, et al. Fosfomycin/met- ronidazole compared with doxycycline/metronidazole for the prophylaxis of infection after elective coloreetal surgery: a randomised double blind multicentre trial in 517 patients[J]. Eur J Surg, 1992, 158(3):181 185.
  • 9Nohr M, Andersen JC, Juul-Jensen KE. Prophylactic single dose fosfomycin and metronidazole compared with neomycin, haeitraein, metronidazole and ampicillin in elective colorectal operations[J]. Acta Chir Seand, 1990, 156(3):223-230.
  • 10Lindhagen J, Hadziomerovic A, Nordlung S, et al. Comparison of systemic prophylaxis with metronidazole-fosfomycin and met- ronidazole-cephalothin in elective colorectal surgery[J]. Acta Chir Scand, 1981, 147(4):277-283.

共引文献1001

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部